Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ernesto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lots of intellectual superiority vibe going on

> here

>

> this is how it all started....


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how all "what" started exactly?



I haven't the foggiest about "what" started, but I do pretty much agree with Che's first line.

Whilst the Golde Age stuff is all very true MP, it was a long time ago Islam (or maybe Islamic states) could have done with having their own versions "Rennaissance/Enligtenment/Scientific revolution" etc rather thn a golden period some 1000+ years ago

I wasn't intentionally lecturing you miga, just musing to myself really on the topics you brought up.


IS ceratinly is a kind of logical terminus of the those strands.

Hopefully it'll crash and burn horribly, pushing arab reaction to a sort of middle ground.


Though IS is also intrinsically the child of the iraqi invasion and the woeful behaviour of US forces/PA there in terms of trigger happiness, detenition without trial and abuse therein, Fallujah and some incredibly stupid strategic decisions politically, along with the powerful Shia arc that has been the ultimate fall out.


Chuck in a hideous civil war and a call to arms for every jihadi fool in the world, and well, we have ISIS, and the al-nusrah front, and fatah al-islam, and ansar-al islam and etc etc.


I think mainstream arab opinion would have liked a nice peaceful transition to democracies and had everyone butt out of the governments they chose, even if, as in Egypt, they were turning into their previous oppressors with some gusto.

It really hasn't worked out that way and Syria was possibly the worst handled of the lot, or Libya, erm or Egypt.


I guess until the oil runs out the area is probably fucked, and days like last week are the inevitable fall out, just as the odd massacre is the price people pay for staving off gun control in the US, or the odd missile is the inevitable price israel is prepared to pay for occupation of the west bank.

That's rather the point though isn't it. Their decline is pretty much a result of our enlightenment.


The response was *indeed* to have their own modernist revolution from the 20s to, well it sort of started dying in 1979 thanks to the soviet invasion and the toppling of the shah, and these experiments are deemed by a broad consensus to have failed miserably.


Though the bastins of those experiments still live, snd are having to survive through a combination of increased welfare and increased brutality.

I'm not say8ng it's the right reaction. The arab spring was sort of a last hurrah at it, though heavily influenced by a compromise, ie non secular modermism.

Sadly our lovely regimes we installed have all been too ruthless (apart from libya, the fool)

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ernesto Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > lots of intellectual superiority vibe going on

> here

>

> By you, maybe!



nah, I mean generally, regarding the patronising western starting point we use as a yardstick for culture/ belief and ting

There's an anecdote that I've always enjoyed when doing culture comparisons. I think I heard it via Starkey or Schama or similar.


During the crusades, Richard is ill and bed-ridden. Saladin, in an act of compassion sends him a bowl of fruit and well wishes.


By way of thanks, in return, Richard sends Saladin a slave.


Nice.

Okay so this is a serious question.


If it's offensive to depict the prophet Mohammed because (as I understand it) he is perfection basically. Is it not more insulting to give your child his name?


To me that doesn't make sense, but I don't claim to be an expert.

Imagine Otta became a very popular name to call children in East Dulwich.Several generations on and the next Special One is born and he is named Otta. Otta was a baby first before going on to give sermons in Goose Green once he had become enlightened. At this stage there were many people called Otta.Some may have been crooks or bakers or even bankers.However there was only one enlightened one and what was important was not his name but what he said.

So to answer your question some Mohammed's might have been named after Uncle Mo who made it big running a bar in America and not necessarily a Profit.....or even a Loss.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jj2 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > People have the right to offend. And to be

> > offended.

> > By the way Charlie Hebdo cover of today is a

> great

> > exapmle of courage and resiliance, without

> being

> > blatantly provocative in my opinion.

>

>

> It's not at all "blatantly provocative", to most

> of us it's just a silly cartoon of a Muslim man.

> If IS find it offensive I couldn?t care less, they

> need to be offended.

>

> My worry about the whole thing is that there are

> lots of young men both in France, here and other

> countries, who feel pretty disaffected already.

> This, at a volatile time, could be just enough to

> tip them over the edge and make them do something

> silly like going off to join IS, or doing

> something silly themselves.

>

> That is why I don't think it should be published,

> not because I find it offensive, but because the

> timing sucks.

>

> There are a million other covers they could have

> used this week which could have shown defiance

> without using that image.


Well put Otta

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah I get that, but if you trace it back, I'm

> sure uncle Mo or whoever he was named after will

> have been named after the prophet.

>

> Does this mean if people put images of me on

> facebook I should be offended and kill them?


Well Jesus is a popular name in Spain and Manchester and he apparently also plays for PSG.....so I'm sure who should be offended?


http://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/verratti-zlatan-claimed-he-was-jesus-inspire-psg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...