Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I used to commute from Forest Hill, which involved using the South Circular as far as Lancaster Avenue. Coming from the East Dulwich direction there are plenty of back routes to get you to Rosendale Road - then a right turn onto the SC for about 100 yards before turning left onto Lancaster Avenue.


After that I went via Lancaster Avenue, York Hill, Knollys Road, Leigham Court Road, Culverhouse Gardens, Gracefield Gardens, Newcome Gardens, Pendennis Road, Becmead Avenue, Garrad's Road, Tooting Bec Road, Upper Tooting Road (this is part of "Cycle Superhighway 7"(!)), Garratt Lane, Wimbledon Road, Plough Lane and Gap Road. Which is as far as I needed to go.


At the top of Gap Road, Alexandra Road takes you into the heart of Wimbledon.


It took me about 45 minutes. I used to go to Wimbledon at about 1.00 am, but the return journey would be during the morning rush and the only real struggle was the traffic around the schools and college from Lancaster Avenue to College Road - the cycle lane is used to allow two lanes of cars! But this obviously wont affect you.

I tried cycling to Tooting recently on a Saturday - there via South Circular, back along CS7 to clapham common and then brixton/herne hill. Both directions were pretty miserable! The SC was grim for obvious reasons, but the CS7 route was really congested with heavy car and lorry traffic, lots of cars pulling into the cycle lane and blaocking it to pull into slow traffic, and even with the cycle lane I got stuck having to weave in and out of stop start traffic. There was one part that descended into chaos as the lights seemed stuck on red and people were taking matters into their own hand and ignoring the signal.


Is it always that bad? or was I just unlucky?

I've done this sometimes in the past. The best part of the ride, if you can get to it, is to go through Tooting Bec Common, from north to south. It's a lovely bit of off road riding.


That means either going through Herne Hill and Brixton and then down Abbeville Road and Cavendish Road (a bit of a long way round), or across Brockwell Park and wiggling down through Upper Tulse Hill -> Telford Avenue -> Emmanuel Road. This means going up and down a hill. Either way it's well worth it though, because the route is a painful urban slog other than that, with lots of bad junctions and little in the way of good cycle route.


Here is a map of the Brixton route: http://goo.gl/maps/Iwv4F

There isn't a pleasant route through South London that I've ever managed to find. Tbh, I'd be tempted to go into town over Lambeth Bridge, along the Embankment to Chelsea, through the back of Chelsea Harbour then back roads to Putney Bridge, over the bridge and straight on up and over the hill to Wimbledon. I reckon it's about 3 miles further than the most direct S London route but actually quite quick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...