Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What does East Dulwich think?


I agree with the idea but I absolutely agree with the blind man who said he could not therefore tell whether he was on the pavement or the road.

If that problem can be sorted out do we think it is a good idea, or a bad one?


Basically, outside Sloane Square tube at the junction with Holbein Place, the road / pavement area has no markings, which makes people pay attention a bit more, and this can only be a good thing. In my opinion as both a pedestrian and a biker.

Haven't seen this - I avoid Sloane Square on my way home now. If this was on place 3-4 months ago then I can only say that I didn't notice any pedestrians taking extra care before walking out into the road. Have almost hit a few that have a stepped out in front of my bike like they didn't have a care in the world. Although this can happen anywhere...stupid pedestrians.(6)
Lived in Chelsea before moving here and went back a while ago and nearly got run over on that bit of road... it is useless.. anyone coming right out of the tube that does not know what it is will walk straight out into the "road". It certainly does not make you "think" more about it. Most people will just think it is fully pedestrianised.
The idea is known as "naked streets". They have used similar things in Europe for a number of years to differing effect. Most notably in the Netherlands where it has been very successful. The emphasis there has been on taking away signs and restrictions for the motorists specifically forcing them to be aware of where they are and what is around them.

I was over Sloane Square way a couple of weeks ago - I'm with PeckhamRose on this one. Just because people have developed sloppy, lazy, selfish habits (both pedestrians and drivers) doesn't mean we should just indulge those habits rather than try and improve things


I've recently read


Traffic - What we drive and what it says about us


and was very impressed by much of the work being done globally. Taking an insular "it's not right!" approach isn't too helpful.


If nothing else - if it doesn't improve traffic flow, or fatalities or speeds - if it only achieves some sort of breakdown in the barriers that exist between "them and us" then it will be useful

Indeed, and whilst the raised pavement bits and central reservationh bits still exist, much of Walworth Road was designed along these lines in that there should be no signs everywhere. One of the councillors who posts on here told us about the hassle he faced trying to get Walworth Road plan proved. My main problem with it is that as the road area itself is quite narrow, bikers and cyclists can't over take stationery traffic and busses as easily and safely.


I often ride around Sloane Square and I do like the design, but I do truly want to know what the answer is to the blind people* who raised the points they raised in the news reports.


*Or whatever the pc people would say.

I cross this most days since I work near Sloane Square and it really doesn't work well. Pedestrians assume since it's one pavement that they can just stroll across with right of way and taxis/cars assume they have right of way and barrel through without particularly slowing down. It's really not very clear what's going on.


There's been no real education on it so until people become a bit more aware of the concept, I think we'll still see the tooting horns and people leaping out of the way on that stretch.

Surely that's to be expected during the initial stages tho Applespider - we are talking about a major shift in behaviour so it will take time


I imagine when they did away with that fella waving a fkag in front of the car there was an outcry too - about safety AND job losses but we surely wouldn't go back?


I'm not decided on this yet - I think it's an interesting direction and I'd like to see it work. Whether it will remains to be seen

But the point about blind people is that they don't necessarily know they have crossed into a road, whereas if they step (or fall) down off the pavement they know the situation.


But I do think that if more of these were put in to place all at the same time across London, there would be major publicity about it and that would be a good thing. I can't wait to see the Exhibition Road example start and was amazed at the news the other night saying that it was going to cost (was it millions?) a lot of money to do it. Just get rid of the signs, smooth the edge of the pavement to blend in with the road, and remember and abide by the first rule of the road.


Which is???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...