Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"when the cemeteries themselves were set up they where right on the edge of the city"


The big cemeteries were set up on the edge of the city only when all the church graveyards were full and overflowing - burials were very much local, and of course still are in more rural areas.


The place is a cemetery, this space was always meant for burials, not a nature reserve. Surely I'm not the only local who has family buried here from way back?

Geneie - Maybe you are not familiar with Southwark?s plans for re-using the cemeteries. Both cemeteries are full, so the council are now reusing them - the burials now and in future will be on top of former graves. Now that the cemeteries are full, many local people feel that the dead already buried should be respected. The Save Southwark Woods campaign is saying that the council has not consulted residents on reusing the cemeteries for new burials in this way and that they should do so, before carrying on clearing areas for rows of soulless new headstones. The council are currently reusing public graves, but have a 40 year plan, so will be moving on to private graves. People who have family buried there "from way back" may need to check that they still have current leases for their family members' graves - the ownership reverts to the council once the lease has expired.
Whilst we still worship the dead and fetishize the paraphernalia of body disposal then cemeteries will continue to be needed as body dumps rather than nature reserves. With a shortage of suitable 'free' land reasonably close to the living (and whilst these still think they need to visit the dead) then the plans for the cemeteries (pile them in, stack them high) are a necessary evil. Persuade people to dispose of the dead with the garden and kitchen waste, and not require a particular place to remember them in, and you can have your nature reserve. But until then...

Yes first mate that is a good point. It is not clear what Southwark's expected revenue and profit from the plans for the two cemeteries are but they have said publicly they use the money to subsidise other services. If they are making money from grieving families and the burial service - then I think public should know about it, how much it is and where the money is going.


Another issue is the Area Z was traditionally used for common/public burials - the new plans seem to suggest the area will be used for private burials - effectively meaning the area will be sold off to private hands plot by plot.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Southwark council still wants to destroy beautiful wild woodlands at Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries, felling dozens of trees, clearing woodland and undergrowth, and excavating acres of old graves, to make way for 4,500+ new burial plots in a sanitised and sterile landscape.


The campaign to Save Southwark Woods was formed in January 2015 to petition Southwark to create 100 acres of protected wildness with respect for the dead, their resting place and memorials and woodland for the living.


Save Southwark Woods are against cutting down trees or clearing undergrowth other than for reasons of health and safety or for the enhancement of wild life. This is to achieve in our lifetimes a beautiful 100 Acre wood in the inner city and a memorial to the dead of Southwark.


They have until July 8th to gather signatures, when they will be presenting the petition and their case to the full Council Assembly. Over 5,000 have already signed online and on paper - they want to make it 10,000 by July.


Can you sign, and help Save Southwark Woods - for nature, for people and for the future?


Sign the 38 Degrees petition here ...?https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/search?q=save+southwark+woods


Web: [email protected]

Twitter:? @southwarkwoods?

Facebook? page:? Save? Southwark? Woods?www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk?

  • 4 weeks later...

There are now 7,500 signatures on paper and online. Thanks so much for everyone's support. We are hoping to get 10,000 before the presenting to the Council Assembly, sSo please share, tell friends, neighbours if you have already signed.


James Barber put the case very well on his blog.


http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2015/06/04/save-southwark-woods/


http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
    • Angela Rayner had this country at her feet but as soon as I saw that photo of her lounging about in the kayak off her new seaside home, vaping and drinking! 
    • This is horrible to hear about. We used to get daily Police patrols on foot & even regular patrols on horseback in the area. I know our local station had some bad eggs, but the officers I came across in the area back then were all a fantastic bunch. Sadly nowadays the Met's presence is non-existent, bar the weekly walk from the SNT. I hope something gets done, arrests made and the victim some genuine support and counselling.   
    • Two wrongs don't make a right. Labour ran on a manifesto of "we aren't like them" and "we are different" and"you can trust us/we will restore faith in politics". They are doing nothing to convince anyone that any of those promises are being met - they are letting everyone down. u-turning on everything and are fast-tracking the doomsday scenario of a Reform government. Even the runway on the "it's all the Tories fault" is running out. I dislike politicians because they cannot be trusted and Rayner just highlighted that with ribbons on. She should have been so careful after the focus on the electoral roll issues she had with the house in Ashton-under-Lyne and then under a year later this comes up. Clearly the advice she took included a recommendation to take proper advice that she failed to do - that's just daft and the most galling thing is that she didn't just resign when this came up - she tried to spin out of it but must have known she was toast. Trust is fast being eroded. I desperately want Labour and Starmer to fix this because the alternative it too scary to think about but the way things are going they are fast-tracking Farage into No.10. Labour are letting us all down.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...