Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"when the cemeteries themselves were set up they where right on the edge of the city"


The big cemeteries were set up on the edge of the city only when all the church graveyards were full and overflowing - burials were very much local, and of course still are in more rural areas.


The place is a cemetery, this space was always meant for burials, not a nature reserve. Surely I'm not the only local who has family buried here from way back?

Geneie - Maybe you are not familiar with Southwark?s plans for re-using the cemeteries. Both cemeteries are full, so the council are now reusing them - the burials now and in future will be on top of former graves. Now that the cemeteries are full, many local people feel that the dead already buried should be respected. The Save Southwark Woods campaign is saying that the council has not consulted residents on reusing the cemeteries for new burials in this way and that they should do so, before carrying on clearing areas for rows of soulless new headstones. The council are currently reusing public graves, but have a 40 year plan, so will be moving on to private graves. People who have family buried there "from way back" may need to check that they still have current leases for their family members' graves - the ownership reverts to the council once the lease has expired.
Whilst we still worship the dead and fetishize the paraphernalia of body disposal then cemeteries will continue to be needed as body dumps rather than nature reserves. With a shortage of suitable 'free' land reasonably close to the living (and whilst these still think they need to visit the dead) then the plans for the cemeteries (pile them in, stack them high) are a necessary evil. Persuade people to dispose of the dead with the garden and kitchen waste, and not require a particular place to remember them in, and you can have your nature reserve. But until then...

Yes first mate that is a good point. It is not clear what Southwark's expected revenue and profit from the plans for the two cemeteries are but they have said publicly they use the money to subsidise other services. If they are making money from grieving families and the burial service - then I think public should know about it, how much it is and where the money is going.


Another issue is the Area Z was traditionally used for common/public burials - the new plans seem to suggest the area will be used for private burials - effectively meaning the area will be sold off to private hands plot by plot.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Southwark council still wants to destroy beautiful wild woodlands at Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries, felling dozens of trees, clearing woodland and undergrowth, and excavating acres of old graves, to make way for 4,500+ new burial plots in a sanitised and sterile landscape.


The campaign to Save Southwark Woods was formed in January 2015 to petition Southwark to create 100 acres of protected wildness with respect for the dead, their resting place and memorials and woodland for the living.


Save Southwark Woods are against cutting down trees or clearing undergrowth other than for reasons of health and safety or for the enhancement of wild life. This is to achieve in our lifetimes a beautiful 100 Acre wood in the inner city and a memorial to the dead of Southwark.


They have until July 8th to gather signatures, when they will be presenting the petition and their case to the full Council Assembly. Over 5,000 have already signed online and on paper - they want to make it 10,000 by July.


Can you sign, and help Save Southwark Woods - for nature, for people and for the future?


Sign the 38 Degrees petition here ...?https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/search?q=save+southwark+woods


Web: [email protected]

Twitter:? @southwarkwoods?

Facebook? page:? Save? Southwark? Woods?www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk?

  • 4 weeks later...

There are now 7,500 signatures on paper and online. Thanks so much for everyone's support. We are hoping to get 10,000 before the presenting to the Council Assembly, sSo please share, tell friends, neighbours if you have already signed.


James Barber put the case very well on his blog.


http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2015/06/04/save-southwark-woods/


http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...