Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, we've done it for trips to see family in NZ. Unless you have a very understanding head and/or a very very good reason it will be unauthorised (we had 2 days absence for my brother's ashes burial and headstone unveiling disallowed! Not "extraordinary circumstances", apparently).


However, chances are nothing will happen, and at worst I think it's ?60 per child fine from the council.


Many people do it, not many admit to it and ring their kids in sick instead - it's those of us honest enough to apply for the leave that get punished.

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It will probably go down as unauthorised...affects

> the school not the child, unless the child's

> absence drops to below 85%

>

> Write to the headteacher to request, expect to be

> refused. Do it anyway


I'm sure it will affect the child too but each to their own reason for taking the child out. As long as it doesn't continue through to Year 2, 3, 4, 5, 6!


Schools are accountable for all absences as curlykaren has pointed out.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Curmudgeon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It will probably go down as

> unauthorised...affects

> > the school not the child, unless the child's

> > absence drops to below 85%

> >

> > Write to the headteacher to request, expect to

> be

> > refused. Do it anyway

>

> I'm sure it will affect the child too but each to

> their own reason for taking the child out. As

> long as it doesn't continue through to Year 2, 3,

> 4, 5, 6!

>

> Schools are accountable for all absences as

> curlykaren has pointed out.


You think a week off school in year 1 is going to affect the child long term?


...ok then

Well yes. Especially as lots of other parents might have been very lucky to get their child into a school of their choice. If they choose to then take their child out during a week of learning then the school should be made aware of this for future reference.


Secondary schools do take account of attendance levels too.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yes. Especially as lots of other parents

> might have been very lucky to get their child into

> a school of their choice. If they choose to then

> take their child out during a week of learning

> then the school should be made aware of this for

> future reference.

>

> Secondary schools do take account of attendance

> levels too.



Yes we do..but I can assure you a week off in year 1 will not raise any kind of blip if their general attendance falls regularly under 95% through to year 7 then there may be some discussions held with parents

What I meant with the secondary schools taking account of attendance levels was that if a parent applies for a place at a chosen secondary school for Year 7, then the secondary school will obviously see attendance records at primary school?


As I said in my post of the 29th each to their own reasons for taking their child out of school for a week and it's up to them.


Wonder if the OP had any pms?

Yes, I know it's not a criteria for secondary schools but maybe it should be.


For instance, if you have two next door neighbours and they want to go to a secondary school and both fulfil all the other criteria? How does a school choose? Just a thought.


I'm so glad I don't have to go through the selection process again for primary and secondary schools but that's maybe another thread.

Nope ...we don't get attendance records until student is on roll


And a child's attendance is a horrific concept as criteria for acceptance to any school. It is either not their fault through sickness or not their fault through parental decisions

Thanks for enlightening me on this Curmudgeon 'Nope, we don't get attendance records until student is on roll' So you are obviously somebody who knows about secondary school criteria but I just thought your remark 'do it anyway' to the OP was quite flippant.

Hmm, sometimes wry humour can come across as flippant within the 1 dimensional constraints of e-communication. I read Curmudgeons comments as the former rather than the latter, but there, I am inclined to Curmudgeons viewpoint. Childhood education encompasses so much more than continuous school attendance. I'm of the 'jump through whatever hoops you want/need, but do it anyway' school of thought. A carefully considered week with loved ones in a new and exciting place can be so much more valuable than a week in the sausage factory that is our education system. Think of all the opportunities for learning - wonderful!


Sorry neighbours ;D

Thanks everyone. Its an unavoidable mistake but will need to take her out. I'm not too fussed as it is Year 1 and so far she is doing really well. Plus what she will benefit from that week is a lot greater (IMO) than a week in school.

So have contacted school got the form just need to fill it out and write a letter.

Fingers crossed it will be ok but I am more than happy to pay the fine on this occasion.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for enlightening me on this Curmudgeon

> 'Nope, we don't get attendance records until

> student is on roll' So you are obviously somebody

> who knows about secondary school criteria but I

> just thought your remark 'do it anyway' to the OP

> was quite flippant.


Yes I work in secondary education, have been a primary school Governor and have a KS2 and a KS3 aged child.


My remark was flippant because my experience has lead me to believe / come to the conclusion that sometimes, in the face of bureaucracy and misguided educational policy, flippancy is warranted.


When my eldest was in KS1 I think I felt that it was wrong to take a child out for a week, even though my children both have virtually impeccable attendance records. I have mellowed with age and direct experience. A child with good attendance and concerned and supportive parents can easily be kept up to speed / catch up with the curriculum


It is my opinion, perhaps somewhat wryly expressed


Others may well think otherwise.

The fine, if applied, is ?60 per child, per parent. I'm happy to pay that if it means my children get to say a goodbye to their uncle, or spend time with their grandparents at an important family time.


Having accused others of being flippant, I feel your post is pretty rude.


The times we have taken our children out of school, I liase with their teachers, take homework, insist that they keep a travel diary to share with their class, and make sure they catch up with missed work.

In the grand scheme of things a week or two in a year/lifetime is nothing .

Eduction goes beyond sitting in a classroom and if people seriously think that the whole education system will crumble or the kids will trail behind simply by taking a week or two off in a year , well, I'm speechless .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...