Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, we've done it for trips to see family in NZ. Unless you have a very understanding head and/or a very very good reason it will be unauthorised (we had 2 days absence for my brother's ashes burial and headstone unveiling disallowed! Not "extraordinary circumstances", apparently).


However, chances are nothing will happen, and at worst I think it's ?60 per child fine from the council.


Many people do it, not many admit to it and ring their kids in sick instead - it's those of us honest enough to apply for the leave that get punished.

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It will probably go down as unauthorised...affects

> the school not the child, unless the child's

> absence drops to below 85%

>

> Write to the headteacher to request, expect to be

> refused. Do it anyway


I'm sure it will affect the child too but each to their own reason for taking the child out. As long as it doesn't continue through to Year 2, 3, 4, 5, 6!


Schools are accountable for all absences as curlykaren has pointed out.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Curmudgeon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It will probably go down as

> unauthorised...affects

> > the school not the child, unless the child's

> > absence drops to below 85%

> >

> > Write to the headteacher to request, expect to

> be

> > refused. Do it anyway

>

> I'm sure it will affect the child too but each to

> their own reason for taking the child out. As

> long as it doesn't continue through to Year 2, 3,

> 4, 5, 6!

>

> Schools are accountable for all absences as

> curlykaren has pointed out.


You think a week off school in year 1 is going to affect the child long term?


...ok then

Well yes. Especially as lots of other parents might have been very lucky to get their child into a school of their choice. If they choose to then take their child out during a week of learning then the school should be made aware of this for future reference.


Secondary schools do take account of attendance levels too.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yes. Especially as lots of other parents

> might have been very lucky to get their child into

> a school of their choice. If they choose to then

> take their child out during a week of learning

> then the school should be made aware of this for

> future reference.

>

> Secondary schools do take account of attendance

> levels too.



Yes we do..but I can assure you a week off in year 1 will not raise any kind of blip if their general attendance falls regularly under 95% through to year 7 then there may be some discussions held with parents

What I meant with the secondary schools taking account of attendance levels was that if a parent applies for a place at a chosen secondary school for Year 7, then the secondary school will obviously see attendance records at primary school?


As I said in my post of the 29th each to their own reasons for taking their child out of school for a week and it's up to them.


Wonder if the OP had any pms?

Yes, I know it's not a criteria for secondary schools but maybe it should be.


For instance, if you have two next door neighbours and they want to go to a secondary school and both fulfil all the other criteria? How does a school choose? Just a thought.


I'm so glad I don't have to go through the selection process again for primary and secondary schools but that's maybe another thread.

Nope ...we don't get attendance records until student is on roll


And a child's attendance is a horrific concept as criteria for acceptance to any school. It is either not their fault through sickness or not their fault through parental decisions

Thanks for enlightening me on this Curmudgeon 'Nope, we don't get attendance records until student is on roll' So you are obviously somebody who knows about secondary school criteria but I just thought your remark 'do it anyway' to the OP was quite flippant.

Hmm, sometimes wry humour can come across as flippant within the 1 dimensional constraints of e-communication. I read Curmudgeons comments as the former rather than the latter, but there, I am inclined to Curmudgeons viewpoint. Childhood education encompasses so much more than continuous school attendance. I'm of the 'jump through whatever hoops you want/need, but do it anyway' school of thought. A carefully considered week with loved ones in a new and exciting place can be so much more valuable than a week in the sausage factory that is our education system. Think of all the opportunities for learning - wonderful!


Sorry neighbours ;D

Thanks everyone. Its an unavoidable mistake but will need to take her out. I'm not too fussed as it is Year 1 and so far she is doing really well. Plus what she will benefit from that week is a lot greater (IMO) than a week in school.

So have contacted school got the form just need to fill it out and write a letter.

Fingers crossed it will be ok but I am more than happy to pay the fine on this occasion.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for enlightening me on this Curmudgeon

> 'Nope, we don't get attendance records until

> student is on roll' So you are obviously somebody

> who knows about secondary school criteria but I

> just thought your remark 'do it anyway' to the OP

> was quite flippant.


Yes I work in secondary education, have been a primary school Governor and have a KS2 and a KS3 aged child.


My remark was flippant because my experience has lead me to believe / come to the conclusion that sometimes, in the face of bureaucracy and misguided educational policy, flippancy is warranted.


When my eldest was in KS1 I think I felt that it was wrong to take a child out for a week, even though my children both have virtually impeccable attendance records. I have mellowed with age and direct experience. A child with good attendance and concerned and supportive parents can easily be kept up to speed / catch up with the curriculum


It is my opinion, perhaps somewhat wryly expressed


Others may well think otherwise.

The fine, if applied, is ?60 per child, per parent. I'm happy to pay that if it means my children get to say a goodbye to their uncle, or spend time with their grandparents at an important family time.


Having accused others of being flippant, I feel your post is pretty rude.


The times we have taken our children out of school, I liase with their teachers, take homework, insist that they keep a travel diary to share with their class, and make sure they catch up with missed work.

In the grand scheme of things a week or two in a year/lifetime is nothing .

Eduction goes beyond sitting in a classroom and if people seriously think that the whole education system will crumble or the kids will trail behind simply by taking a week or two off in a year , well, I'm speechless .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This may be somewhat out of date but virtually no environmental benefit & almost entirely grass... really? https://www.gigl.org.uk/sinc/sobi09/ Description Peckham Rye was established as an open space in the late 19th century and includes several valuable habitat features spread across the park. The park is a Grade II Listed landscape, and has recently been restored with assistance from the Heritage Lottery Fund. A small community garden within the site is managed by the Friends of Peckham Rye. Peckham Rye Park won a Green Flag Award again for 2022. The site is used by the Southwark Health Walks project as part of a Walking the Way to Health (WHI) scheme. Wildlife This large park has several valuable habitat features. The most important of these is the only remaining above-ground section of the River Peck and the most natural stream in the borough. The stream is heavily shaded by native, unmanaged wet woodland dominated by alder, ash and pedunculated oak with a ground cover of pendulous sedge and bramble. Alder dominated woodland is a rare habitat in Southwark. Although somewhat altered with weirs, other artificial structures and ornamental planting, some sections are still in their natural banks and includes yellow flag, watercress, water figwort and cuckooflower. The largest of three ponds supports marginal vegetation including hemp agrimony. A variety of waterfowl nest on the wooded island, including tufted duck, coot, Canada goose and mallard. Substantial flocks of gulls visit the park in winter and bats are likely to forage over the water. Small blocks of predominantly native woodland, mostly on the boundary between the Park and the Common, are dominated by oak and ash with a well-developed understory, but sparse ground flora. Spring bulbs have been planted in previous years. These and several dense shrubberies support a good bird population and small numbers of pipistrelle bats are present. Infrequently mown grassland is located in one large area and was seeded in 2009. It's composition includes giant fescue, ladies bedstraw, meadowsweet, black knapweed and wild carrot. The rest of the park consists of amenity grassland with some fine mature trees.  
    • Same here. Incredibly selfish behaviour. Also illegal.
    • I heard them & our two dogs were extremely upset by it..  bad enough during the evenings but at least can have music on to dilute the noise!   Some people have literally zero thoughts for others!! 
    • I have signed that petition.  Someone was letting off loud fireworks at about 3 am this morning. They woke me up.   I don’t know where they were exactly but it sounded like they were in the vicinity of Dog Kennel Hill.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...