Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a fundamental problem with pelican crossings in that the green man and flashing amber activate at the same time, so you get impatient drivers trying to get away and you get impatient pedestrians entering the crossing when they should stay put.


The Highway Code says that the flashing green man means 'Pedestrians should not start to cross if the green man is flashing'. But they do, as green means 'go'.


Far better to do away with both and have a flashing RED man and no flashing amber, just go straight to green, like in Australia.


I bet there are dozens of accidents caused by this poor design and interpretation of the rules.

I think that's a bit of a poor excuse to be honest. Regardless of whether the light is just changing - as a driver, you must be aware of pedestrians who may run across on a flashing green. It's not good enough to take the 'it's my right of way so I'll go regardless' attitude. You may be technically in the right, but you've still run over someone. Result.
You're right, rrr, emphasis is of course on the cars to proceed with caution. But at the same time, pedestrians running out onto the crossing is clearly dangerous, and I think kford is suggesting this is what the flashing green man encourages.
RRR, I always look at the pedestrians, like many other road users, yet there's often someone who sees the flashing green man and thinks 'all clear' and dashes out from nowhere. Especially in central London where there are tourists just see green for go. It's a flawed design.

@ JohnL separating cars and bicycles on main roads can't happen soon enough. But I think we'll be waiting a while, the Cycle Superhighway that was supposed to run along LL and DKH has been cancelled.



If you can get a picture of them texting at the wheel and the number plate then I don't think you need much more, evidentially, for the police to take it up.



If only this were true. A friend of mine recently saw a driver in a Ferrari California (?150,000 supercar) with instantly recognisable custom numberplate using an iPad as he drove across Tower Bridge. She reported almost immediately to a police officer on a bike (don't know if City Police or Metropolitan); the officer took absolutely no interest whatsoever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was planning to come on here to ask if anyone might know which celeb/royal came through Lordship Lane yesterday - was on my way up to Spurs, on bus at the roundabout by the EDT when some whistling police cyclists pulled the traffic to the side of the road to allow a biggish range rover to shoot past, on the way up towards Dog Kennel Hill. Could only make out two, maybe middle-aged, men in the front before it passed. Mildly hysterical lady on pavement was laughing/screeching with her friend that they were desperately trying to find out who it was. Had more reason to post after this lunchtime's experience. Had just got to bus stop opposite the M&S by the station when some mini cooper thing bombed through the traffic, swerving across to cut up another car to get up the hill, before two or three police cars followed about 20 seconds behind. Said mini cooper thing then reappeared coming the other way, beeping its horn to get other cars out the way before it bombed up what I think was Elsie Road, with police cars now on both sides of the road by Maxin trying to stop traffic getting in the way/half the speeding car. Bit more than I had bargained for when I set out/want in local area! Stay careful out there folks, this place is getting scarier...
    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...