Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only a thought, but the police might not want

> their presence plastered across the local forum if

> they're keeping tabs on something?

>

> HP


They wouldn't be undercover in a marked police car

or would they ..... :)


I remember in the 80s a "copper" on the phone to his wife ..

"I'll be late tonight as I'm working undercover in XXXXX bar"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54535-xx/#findComment-823980
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Only a thought, but the police might not want

> > their presence plastered across the local forum

> if

> > they're keeping tabs on something?

> >

> > HP

>

> They wouldn't be undercover in a marked police

> car

> or would they ..... :)

>

> I remember in the 80s a "copper" on the phone to

> his wife ..

> "I'll be late tonight as I'm working undercover in

> XXXXX bar"


Good point lol...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54535-xx/#findComment-823986
Share on other sites

Yeah. Police doing convert surveillance or protection. OP asks why they're there and is told nothing to worry about. That would be enough for most of us but not the OP who feels the need to advertise it on a public forum and blow their operation. Soome people really are stu..., no I'll stop there :D
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54535-xx/#findComment-824000
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...