Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As some of you may be aware, Southwark Council is consulting on its New Southwark Plan (the "Plan") to manage regeneration and development from 2018 - 2033. Here is a link to the Plan Options Paper for further background: www.southwark.gov.uk/newsouthwarkplan


The Plan is particularly concerned with new housing provision in Southwark. It identifies sites which may potentially be developed for housing (or other amenities). Among the sites is the Judith Kerr Primary School.


We understand that the School has been included in the Plan because the owner of the freehold, Dulwich Estate, has ambitions to develop the green space east of the School building for residential housing.


The green space is part of the fabric of the School. It allows our children to escape the pressures of the classroom, and enjoy sports and recreation. The green space is also home to an embryonic organic vegetable patch which will have an educational benefit as well as being open to the local community. Ultimately, we will attempt to designate the green space as a "Local Green Space" and thereby preserve it for use by the School.


We ask the community to oppose the development of the green space for the benefit of the school children and for future generations. We therefore urge you to contact [email protected] no later than Friday 6th March, and register your objection to the inclusion of the School in the Plan as a site for potential housing development.

If the school doesn't actually own the freehold of the place where it is - I'm not sure what else could be done. Surely the funding agreement the school has with the EFA requires them to have signed a long term lease with Dulwich Estates (unless Dulwich Estates plans to relocate the school?) OR the existing site is a temporary one and the school are looking to (eventually) relocate. That's what the agreement below seems to suggest


http://www.education.gov.uk/cgi-bin/schools/performance/school.pl?urn=139907&downloadfs=pdf&numfile=1

You can still attempt to register the site as green space - irrespective of it being in private hands. And loz the info you are provided with is incorrect, the lease is currently for the ENTIRE site. Landsberger the site is leased on a long term basis, with the specific green space being under option for development for a period of 5 years from contract start. It is the 5 year option that is the concern to the school parents and i guess the majority of the local community.

Loz - you are incorrect. The school leases the entire site, including the green space which the school uses actively for sports, education and recreation.


Dulwich Estate has an option to apply for planning permission to develop the green space for housing. If planning permission is granted, it will take away the green space from the school.


Dulwich Estate does not have to do this. They can keep the lease as it is so the green space can remain part of the school and can be enjoyed by the children of JKPS over the long term.


Dulwich Estate is in a highly hypocritical position. It is an education charity that is looking to raise funds for its schools (Dulwich College, JAGs etc.) by depriving another education charity which runs JKPS of its facilities in terms of the green space. That is really rotten.


How will that look to the charity commission?


Dulwich Estate clearly knew there would be this conflict of interest when they agreed to lease the site to the school.


I hope as many people as possible should lodge their objections to help this local primary school. I will object.

Stephent - you mean poor innocent naive Dulwich Estate has been inadvertently duped? I really don?t think so.


DE knew there was this obvious conflict of interest and in terms of the lease that they would be taking the green space AWAY from the school and the children.


As a education charity, DE intimately knows the importance of enabling a school to be a decent school with decent facilities. DE has an obligation with the charity commission to consider the public benefit. Resourcing its schools by removing leased and paid for resources from other schools is not to the public benefit. The whole community needs good schools. The green space is important to this for JKPS.


The site was unused for years and they could have put housing on it ages ago if they really wanted to.

no Loz - Some areas that may be considered for designation as Local Green Space may already have largely unrestricted public access, though even in places like parks there may be some restrictions. However, other land could be considered for designation even if there is no public access (e.g. green areas which are valued because of their wildlife, historic significance and/or beauty).


Designation does not in itself confer any rights of public access over what exists at present. Any additional access would be a matter for separate negotiation with land owners, whose legal rights must be respected.


Considering your interest in this matter, I hope the information that has been presented to you, (and others who read the conversation) encourages you to make a representation to planning!

I think the inclusion of the site as a development site is based on a historic anomaly. The building was vacant for over 20 years since the James Black Institute ceased to occupy it so it was indeed a development site. Now it has been developed (as a school for 350 children) and Southwark has simply failed to update the site's status in the draft Southwark plan. My heart sinks that a Labour-led council might favour luxury houses over school playgrounds, but I hope they are just playing it by the book to avoid a legal challenge from DE when its status is changed to "school" or tge playgrounds to "open space".

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a whole thread on this a while ago...

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,1429642,page=1

>

> Basically, the green space is not part of the

> school.


Totally wrong - and misrepresents the thread. The green space IS most definitely part of the school's demise under its lease and it is used quite intensively at play times (to the extent that it is presently more of a brown space than a green space!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...