Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These companies rarely buy the property

> themselves, they're essentially an agency/broker

> for cash investors.

>

> Without doubt unscrupulous. But I find it hard to

> muster sympathy for people daft enough to fall for

> it.


People sometimes need to move house quickly (ill-health, new job). They fall for a sales patter, and, to be fair to those people, the companies involved are quite devious and persuasive - claiming to be endorsed by celebrities, charities and that they're regulated by the Property Ombudsman (who have no legal powers).


As you say, completely unscrupulous. But, unfortunately, perfectly legal. What is needed - and should have happened years ago - was for them to be regulated somehow.

Surely it is only a small number of highly vulnerable individuals who don't have the ability to figure out for themselves what their house is really worth (or have people who can help them with this). Of course I have sympathy for these people. But if it's simply a question of falling for sales patter (or worse still, celebrity endorsements) then I have very little...

Agree, but where do you draw the line?


Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to their fraudulent claims)


Mobile phone companies (who effectively charge an extortionate rate of interest if you get a smartphone directly from them as part of a package)


Insurance companies racking up renewal rates and associated charges for loyal customers (nearly always cheaper to renew as a new customer)


The list goes on

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to their

> fraudulent claims)


Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not seen any difference between TTL and train companies prices. Have I missed something?

Ex-council houses sold off at massive discount to people who then struggle to keep up repayments. Sell it on to one of these sharks, again for less then market value and suddenly it's part of someone's property portfolio. They rent it back to someone who would previously been renting from the council at full market rates and taxpayer picks up the housing benefit bill. Everybody gets shafted, except the 'buy to letter', who get's a lovely big subsidy from the state and claims it's free market capitalism in practice.
Greed is good and profit before people and all that. The government today sold it's 40% stake in Eurostar (a profittable business btw) to the French and Canadians. And we wonder why we have poor tax receipts and our economy is nose diving? Why don't we have the power to stop a government, that never had a public mandate to govern, from selling of what little is left to foreign shareholders?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking

> via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye to

> their

> > fraudulent claims)

>

> Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not

> seen any difference between TTL and train

> companies prices. Have I missed something?


Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees and booking fees.


Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy tickets for any train company from any train company).


East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now give Nectar points instead.


Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused tickets (others charge at least ?10).


Telegraph found that booking direct saves around ?10 on average http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/11333215/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.html

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lowlander Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking

> > via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye

> to

> > their

> > > fraudulent claims)

> >

> > Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not

> > seen any difference between TTL and train

> > companies prices. Have I missed something?

>

> Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees

> and booking fees.

>

> Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy

> tickets for any train company from any train

> company).

>

> East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now give

> Nectar points instead.

>

> Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused

> tickets (others charge at least ?10).

>

> Telegraph found that booking direct saves around

> ?10 on average

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/1133321

> 5/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.h

> tml



I've never paid more than a pound extra. I collect my tickets from a machine at the station, which is the easiest method anyway.


I'd be astonished if most train companies didn't charge to send tickets home.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ex-council houses sold off at massive discount to

> people who then struggle to keep up repayments.

> Sell it on to one of these sharks, again for less

> then market value and suddenly it's part of

> someone's property portfolio. They rent it back to

> someone who would previously been renting from the

> council at full market rates and taxpayer picks up

> the housing benefit bill. Everybody gets shafted,

> except the 'buy to letter', who get's a lovely big

> subsidy from the state and claims it's free market

> capitalism in practice.


Im not seeing any surplus value from that construct bro'

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Lowlander Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than

> booking

> > > via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye

> > to

> > > their

> > > > fraudulent claims)

> > >

> > > Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've

> not

> > > seen any difference between TTL and train

> > > companies prices. Have I missed something?

> >

> > Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees

> > and booking fees.

> >

> > Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy

> > tickets for any train company from any train

> > company).

> >

> > East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now

> give

> > Nectar points instead.

> >

> > Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused

> > tickets (others charge at least ?10).

> >

> > Telegraph found that booking direct saves

> around

> > ?10 on average

> >

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/1133321

>

> >

> 5/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.h

>

> > tml

>

>

> I've never paid more than a pound extra. I collect

> my tickets from a machine at the station, which is

> the easiest method anyway.

>

> I'd be astonished if most train companies didn't

> charge to send tickets home.



None of the train companies charges a booking fee.


None of them charge for using a credit card.


Some offer a discount for booking direct (can be as much as 10%).


Some will give you a total refund on unused tickets (trainline charge ?10)


Most will post out free of charge


This means that without exception you are better off booking through any of the Train companies than the trainline (see the article).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...