Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I cant believe that they owe this much money now and Boris and Ken seem useless getting this money back!


http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=66573624065


TOTAL NOW OWED TO LONDONERS: ?26,221,664!!!

Top 20 NON-PAYERS:


AMERICAN EMBASSY ?2,941,500

RUSSIAN FEDERATION ?2,162,460

EMBASSY OF JAPAN ?2,003,040

EMBASSY OF GERMANY ?1,837,330

NIGERIAN HIGH COMMISSION ?1,475,230

SUDAN ?989,320

INDIA ?755,500

POLAND ?665,160

KENYA HIGH COMMISSION ?657,430

GHANA ?593,540

REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA ?585,820

FRENCH EMBASSY ?563,200

SPANISH EMBASSY ?544,520

EMBASSY OF UKRAINE ?527,040

EMBASSY OF GREECE ?525,180

SOUTH AFRICA ?514,600

EMBASSY OF ROMANIA ?493,840

EMBASSY OF ALGERIA ?450,320

SIERRA LEONE ?434,780

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA ?314,500


TfL have said "the vast majority of Embassies continue to pay the Congestion Charge as they are required to do. The Mayor and TfL are committed to engaging with the non paying Embassies in a proactive manner in order to seek a resolution to this matter." ITS BEEN OVER FIVE YEARS THOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!

Fucking liberty. If you are working and living in a foreign country you should respect their laws. It?s just plain courtesy. (I realise that the British, especially their military would do well also head this advice abroad but that is not the argument here).


Perhaps it is just indicative of the amount of respect Britain has lost internationally.

Uh, perhaps it's because the "congestion" charge is a nakedly money-grabbing illegitimate scam imposed by the former mayor. Bring on its demise. Soon. And before the inevitable onslaught, I am not some mad right wing ideologue intent on burning the planet to a crisp. Just an ordinary bloke who has the crazy subversive idea that people should be able to travel where they please in their own city, without having to pay some bogus tax. Forgive the thought-crime.

northlondoner Wrote:

Just an ordinary bloke who has the crazy subversive idea that people should be able to travel where they please in their own city, without having to pay some bogus tax. Forgive the thought-crime.


I fear the worst for you here Sir, with that kind of attitude!


"travel where they please"-- "bogus tax"- Its that kind of free thinking that will be frowned on by a significant number My Son !:))


What are you, some kind of ageing Hippy?


p.s Red Ken never did explain how the Congestion Tax would not BLATANTLY affect the poor the most, for obvious reasons!


p.s Lucky he's a Socialist..roflmao:))

Hey northlondoner... what exactly does the congestion charge stop you from doing? Why can't you take public transport into central London like most other people? Surely you can tell that the roads weren't designed for huge numbers of vehicles, and that there's not much space for parking.


Tony.London Suburbs - not sure how it affects the poor the most. They can't be that poor if they own a car (which is a luxury in London, not a necessity) and can afford petrol!

whilst I wouldn't call you a "mad right wing ideologue intent on burning the planet to a crisp" (yet) you haven't exactly come up with any reasonable alternative to the increasing problem of congestion in major cities. Coninually expanding LA style is clearly not a solution any more (if it ever was)


Prediction: In not too many years people will see Ken as forward-thinking on this issue and just as "the public" are berating politicians now for not doing anything about the financial crisis before it hit, people will complain about why governments didn't do anything to prevent whatever environmental horrors await

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Tony.London Suburbs - not sure how it affects the

> poor the most. They can't be that poor if they own

> a car (which is a luxury in London, not a

> necessity) and can afford petrol!


Jeremy, the objective was to remove a percentage of Motorists off the Road by financially forcing some to not take the car.


By definition, those in a lesser financial position to pay will have been the ones to have departed, leaving those in a better financial position to enjoy the extra space that the removal of these Guys gave!



A common criticism but one that doesn't stand up. The genuinely poor never drove into central London anyway - they took transport and live a fair bit away so are already paying for transport and spending a few quid a day just to get in to central London. As someone who takes the bus I can validate absolutely that the congestion charge benefited those poor directly as bus journeys improved significantly.

Moos Wrote:

Hey northlondoner, I thought you was a bird. No idea why.


Moos: Will you not "gleefully" "denigrate" (one has a Memory:))) Women by jokingly referring to them as "birds" you are not Michael (You are only supposed to blow the bleedin' doors off!) Caine....though you are very Able...:))

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> A common criticism but one that doesn't stand up.

> The genuinely poor never drove into central London

> anyway - they took transport and live a fair bit

> away so are already paying for transport and

> spending a few quid a day just to get in to

> central London. As someone who takes the bus I can

> validate absolutely that the congestion charge

> benefited those poor directly as bus journeys

> improved significantly.


Sean: Ken chose financial means to remove as many Motorists as possible.


Surely then the only people who'se choice of Transport immediately changed overnight, were those who were least in a position to afford the Charge?

...and what about the "poor" Motorist? --pun only slightly intended;-)

TLS, you weren't one of those of whom I spoke. However, there are contributors to that thread who remain in my mind The Unforgiven.


And I assert that 'bird' is the appropriate counterpart to 'bloke', just as 'woman' is to 'man' and 'lady' to 'gentleman'. Any questions?


See, now I'm going to have to think of something to say about the C-charge in order to avoid accusations of thread de-railing. Tschah.


OK - I am in favour. I am not in favour of the Western extension. And I think the chuffing Embassies should pay up, the arrogant so-and-so's.

Tony, you have just ignored my point to reiterate your own


Is there another way to remove cars from the road other than financial means? A fiver a day (at the time) is roughly similar to a day travelcard in London. Most poor people are already doing the latter but I don't hear the motorist lobby bleat about the poor from that perpective. But you get a fat, well paid middle-manager to give up his car and take a tube and you hear PLENTY about the cost of public transport then, oh yes indeedy

Moos Wrote:

TLS, you weren't one of those of whom I spoke. However, there are contributors to that thread who remain in my mind The Unforgiven.


I am Madam, thoroughly remorseful..a Thousand Apologies...:)


And I assert that 'bird' is the appropriate counterpart to 'bloke', just as 'woman' is to 'man' and 'lady' to 'gentleman'. Any questions?


Nah! Not me M8 I make you right!...I should have noted that...tls slinks away head bowed in utter shame...:(


Am I forgiven Darling?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony, you have just ignored my point to reiterate

> your own


No I ain't Guv'nor..I was comparing the "poor" Motorist to the "poor" who use LT...though I DID add that, so you may not have seen it Sean.

>

> Is there another way to remove cars from the road

> other than financial means? A fiver a day (at the

> time) is roughly similar to a day travelcard in

> London. Most poor people are already doing the

> latter but I don't hear the motorist lobby bleat

> about the poor from that perpective. But you get a

> fat, well paid middle-manager to give up his car

> and take a tube and you hear PLENTY about the cost

> of public transport then, oh yes indeedy


"fat" as in "financially2 fat, I trust...I disapproove of folk generalising on here:))

"Poor" people never drove into central London, as genuinely poor Londoners do not own cars.


Normal/middle-income people rarely drove into central London because there's nowhere to park, and even if you find somewhere, it's ?4 an hour or something. Companies in London only usually have parking available for the top brass.


So I don't understand how it's affecting poor people, or even the likes of you and I. Why not penalise the wealthy (who choose a less socially responsible and environmentally friendly way to travel) by an amount they can afford? It's not going into anyone's pockets, it's put back into public funds and presumably put to good use.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ok so you went back and edited your post


umm..slightly begruding..but swiftly moving on...


but> what is with this "overnight" business? It was discussed for years, in his manifesto and voted in..


They may have known for yonks but they were only "affected" from Day 1, as it were


And come on, let's have the TLS solution to congestion


Its that "tone" again!....but as you ask...INCREASE PETROL!...the more you use the roads-- the more you pay!


Fair?

sorry Tone - I'll try and reign in my "tone"


;-)




Surely by that token, no democratic change can ever take place tha affects some people? When are notice and the chance to vote against something unsufficient?




Would this also not affect the poor? And more importantly, how would it affect congestion.


But also if I recall, when the government has previously increased petrol charges what happened? Oh yeah.. the innocent and responsible motorists blockaded the roads, brought the country to a standstill and endangered essential services. As a group, motorists are very much of the adolescent, aggressive teenager mentality

As a group, most motorists are very much of the belief that if you pay for a car (and give a proportion of that to the Govt) and pay Road Tax (and give a proportion of that to the Govt) and pay for your Insurance and MOT (and give a proportion of that to the Govt) and pay some of the most exorbitant amounts for Petrol in Europe (and give a LARGE proportion of that to the Govt) and pay exorbitant Parking Charges..that they should then be able to use the roads, where and when they choose..:))...but thats just their mentality...;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...