Jump to content

Protect Peckham's Future: art deco, cultural economy, & more


Eileen

Recommended Posts

This all sounds a bit sanctimonious to me.


I'm not really a particular fan of those buildings, but I think it's OK to give them a lick of paint. We're not talking about radical redevelopment. Gap are not going to be moving in as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Residents of East Dulwich complaining about estate

> agent boards - conscientious pillars of the

> community

> Residents of Peckham complaining about buildings

> in a state of disrepair - fascists hell-bent on

> ethnic cleansing



I don't mind the Chrysler building (which is Art Deco) - but I can't appreciate the Art Deco

in Peckham


I think of 1930s austerity rather than 1920s fun. Maybe that's me - or maybe they need to be

cleared of signage. I can't believe that what they are now is how they were designed ?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great to see a spirited exchange on this topic. Would be great also to see you at the meetings and discussions taking part, and reporting back to EDF for further discussion. We have put out some info for key issues to think about for this evening - TODAY at 6.30pm All Saints Hall, Blenheim Grove. You can see these here https://peckhamresidents.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/station-workshop-today-6-30pm-key-issues/ and on https://www.facebook.com/PeckhamVision and



Peckham Vision grew out of local community concern in 2005 about poor decision making on the big development site designated for a tram depot in Peckham town centre. So it developed a way of local people tracking these developments to help continue the process of throwing light on these complicated matters and developing ways of increasing the numbers of people now following the town centre developments as a whole (over 6000+). We encourage and facilitate where we can ideas to be floated and we collect information about them and aim to translate them to be widely understandable by as many local people as possible.


We now have a small place in the shopping arcade at 135a Rye Lane between Khan?s Bargain stores and Sky City. Open 2-4pm on Saturdays and Tuesdays, but shop information displays are open to view at all times. Please come and see us and talk about the issues you raise on the EDF. It would be nice to have yr support for the hard work that goes into this and your greater understanding that some of the criticisms, while tackling important issues which we are also concerned with, are sometimes misplaced as far as Peckham Vision is concerned.


We work in detail with local traders and are mini traders ourselves now. Do come and find out the work that a number of people in the community, and in the council and their consultants, have done to widen participation. Could be much better all round, and the more volunteers there are the more can be achieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am a big fan of art deco buildings - but it

> looks to me as if to restore these to their former

> glory would cost a fortune.

>

> I don't know what the ownership status is of them

> at present, but if they are owned by the

> occupiers, I somehow doubt they could afford it,

> and if the current businesses in those spaces

> don't own them, I doubt many would be able to

> afford the increased rents post restoration. But

> perhaps I've missed something and there is a way

> of having both.


There's no point in restoring them unless they are

kept restored and maintained.


Otherwise might as well get rid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

> I totally agree with keekybreeks on this. I am not

> saying that any plans are bad (I don't really have

> an opinion), but it's a white middle class group

> trying to build a new Peckham in their own image.


But that's how England was built since the Anglo Saxons

(or their culture) displaced the Britons.


I'm sure every group is capable of being heard - maybe

the people in authority are not listening ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is that Peckham is going to change, is already changing, along with all of inner London. I think the results will be better if there are concerned citizens (even if they're not entirely representative of all the community) trying to steer the changes, than if it's just left entirely to commercial developers. At least with Peckham Vision there is an organisation that is trying to influence the changes and (as best they can), to reflect and balance some of the interests of local people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some key points that came out of the workshop last Thursday: https://www.facebook.com/PeckhamRyeStation/posts/837913912946171


In further summary:

* next workshop in May will give designs for the new square space/buildings; this has been delayed because of need to do more investigation of construction of existing buildings. This will be an additional workshop so four in all now.

* Blenheim Grove corner building may have two storeys added on top of current two storeys.

* Holly Grove buildings (Iceland + Hannah Barry Gallery) are excluded from codesign process, so information is withheld on plans being developed for them, in same timescale, ie planning application to be submitted during summer by leaseholders Bywaters who are owners of Iceland.


Were you there? Would you add any comments or information?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...