Jump to content

Recommended Posts

cl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm, lets not kid ourselves that it will all be

> sorted at the planning committee meeting.

>

> They didn't sort it last time. In fact, they

> mainly acknowledged how badly it had been dealt

> with by the council...... But then decided to

> approve it anyway. I remember quite clearly one of

> the counsellors who voted in favour turning round

> once it was a done deal, looking me in the eye and

> offering me an sympathetic shrug as if to say 'I'm

> sorry, there's just nothing I could do'. Which

> clearly was not the case. She could have voted

> against.

>

> James are you able to do anything in advance to

> encourage them to grow some balls this time round

> rather than just rolling over again?


Sadly I recall a similar response from a different councillor too.


I'd like to think someone somewhere would step up and ensure everything was done properly but I seriously doubt it :-\

robbin it has nothing to do with my view on the outcome (which I don't believe I have expressed anywhere on this thread either for or against) - it was admitted in the meeting that none of it (previous application) was handled properly forcing the application through.

With this in mind what hope is there that it will be handled any better this time round?


There are already signs - residents failing to be notified, as a simple example - that it's just a repeat of before.

I have just submitted an objection as follows:


Southwark?s Residential Design Standards SPD states:

?where there is an extant planning permission and a fresh planning permission is submitted for a revised scheme taking the total units above 10 units, the residential design standards for major applications will be applied. The council will seek to ensure that proposals deliberately designed to circumvent the threshold of 10 units will not be accepted.


In this case, permission has already been given for change of use of the existing office space to 8 flats. The 8 reconfigured office units included in this new proposal bear a remarkable resemblance in layout to the 8 flats so recently approved, and Councillors might consider it a deliberate attempt to circumvent the threshold of 10 units, in which case they must reject the application.


Lordship Lane is in the Suburban Zone, so any development of 10 units or more must include 35% affordable housing and 30% of family sized flats of 3 or more bedrooms. This application meets neither criteria and so must be rejected.


The London Plan Policy 3.2 limits heights in the Suburban Zone to 3 storeys. This proposal for a fourth storey must therefore be rejected.


The SPD allows flexibility in calculating the density of mixed use developments where the majority of the floor space is non-residential. In this case, the combined residential use, proposed plus already approved, exceeds the proposed retail area, so the formula must be applied. The proposed density is about twice the 350 hr/ha permitted in the Suburban Zone. It must therefore be rejected.


MarkT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...