Jump to content

Recommended estate agents: No Flies


adrianykw

Recommended Posts

I'd like to recommend No Flies as a fantastic estate agent (this is a totally independent review!)


No Flies don't have an office so the price was competitive and fixed; at the time of my sale they were VAT free. The whole team consists of two directors (Tony and Brendan).


Set up of the sale, photography, use of the largest online sites (Zoopla etc.) and viewings were managed by No Flies - Tony and Brendan organised to meet me at my property or at a private residence in East Dulwich whenever I needed them.


The two directors were always available and extremely proactive during a tricky sale. I was a very demanding client - I was calling / emailing Tony several times a day during the final parts of the sale and he was both courteous and prompt in his response.


I'd strongly recommend Brendan and Tony, they made my life simpler, achieved the price I was after and were significantly cheaper than the high street equivalents.


Any questions feel free to PM me - happy to chat more.


Cheers!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...