Jump to content

Recommended Posts

tallulah71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who say "I" instead of "me".

>

> E.G,

>

> "That ice-cream's for her and I".....Take out the

> 'Her' and you're saying, "it's for I".

> Should be, "her and me".

>

> "This area really suits Simon and I".....no it

> doesn't, it suits "Simon and me".

>

>

> "This has been a real learning curve for Gill and

> I, because...." GILL AND ME!

>

> (All real statements)

>

> "He and I love these kids" - OK. take out "He" and

> I still love the kids!

>

> SIMPLES



it's grammatically correct to say 'I' in all those cases

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually, yes, I do.

>

> As is evident by blah blah ad nauseum etc etc.


I disagree with the points you're making there katie1997. You're simply unable to understand the concept I'm trying to explain.

I meant it as in burke but without the 'r' sound (hard to spell if you think about it)- Same goes for cook, look etc.


I have no problem with 'luke' or any other genuinely accent/region derived pron. but when people pronounce it as though they were 5 years old and fail to rhyme book with rook (I know, that doesn't really help)it grates.


If this thread had said 'tiny little things that cause you rational rage' I would go further. But it doesn't. So I won't.

tallulah71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rosie H...No, it isn't.


tallulah, it is you know: I = subject, me = object


I assume you meant "Rose21...No, it isn't"? If you're going to get all bloody nora about it, at least direct your ire not at the person who's agreeing with you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We did fine for 300 years with the Royal Mail before the current "competitive" shambles was introduced. Now we have multiple companies with multiple vehicles making deliveries to the same streets every day, none of the workers are employees with decent working conditions or any job security, and consumers have to deal with x different distribution networks and apps and platforms and drop-off points... https://postandparcel.info/12422/news/uk-royal-mails-monopoly-to-end-on-1-january-2006/
    • That's certainly the narrative that runs ad infinitum on the Forum but I wonder how true it is. Speaking for myself I'm very happy M&S, Superdrug, Pret and, in the last century, Sainsbury's arrived and judging from the business they do I'm not alone.
    • There are Christmas lights?! Or a, I missing something?
    • Though it's often the big corporates who dig deepest. For small independents that's a bigger ask, decorating, when they do their own premises is cost enough. And we're normally happy not to have the big corporates in LL. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...