Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have children. We didn't have kids at our

> wedding. I love a wedding where kids aren't

> allowed. Better fun for all concerned. Mostly the

> parents



You didn't have kids when you got married - shocker.


That's the whole point. Wake up to the question.

We welcomed kids, had about 30 of them there, and it was great. We hired an entertainer, child care and a bouncy castle. They ate at the 'top' table together, served first, and did what they wanted for the whole event. Noise during the ceremony was not an issue for us - not fussed if there's a bit of background noise, and to be honest we were happy not to be the centre of attention the whole time. Lots of our guests said how nice it was to be able to bring kids and not have childcare worries, but be able to spend at least part of the day not 'parenting'. But then we married late enough that many of our friends had kids, and my own partner did. We also had an informal wedding with a fish and chip van for food, so no big charge per head, so it cost very little to include all the children.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stag dos: invite the kiddies or not?



Hmm, all the exotic dancers I've known have been really lovely women.


I'm sure if you agreed a price beforehand, they'd gladly look after the kiddies. Probably cheaper than the price of a babysitter in ED!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Shall I cancel the strippers then?

>

>

> And the gambling. Put the cash towards extra

> cocaine.



On second thought, cocaine in London is over-priced rubbish. http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/london-theres-no-cocaine-in-your-cocaine-940


I think these guys had the right idea for an exciting wedding... http://wundergroundmusic.com/wedding-ruined-after-groom-accidentally-serves-guests-ketamine-instead-of-powdered-alcohol/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...