Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have children. We didn't have kids at our

> wedding. I love a wedding where kids aren't

> allowed. Better fun for all concerned. Mostly the

> parents



You didn't have kids when you got married - shocker.


That's the whole point. Wake up to the question.

We welcomed kids, had about 30 of them there, and it was great. We hired an entertainer, child care and a bouncy castle. They ate at the 'top' table together, served first, and did what they wanted for the whole event. Noise during the ceremony was not an issue for us - not fussed if there's a bit of background noise, and to be honest we were happy not to be the centre of attention the whole time. Lots of our guests said how nice it was to be able to bring kids and not have childcare worries, but be able to spend at least part of the day not 'parenting'. But then we married late enough that many of our friends had kids, and my own partner did. We also had an informal wedding with a fish and chip van for food, so no big charge per head, so it cost very little to include all the children.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stag dos: invite the kiddies or not?



Hmm, all the exotic dancers I've known have been really lovely women.


I'm sure if you agreed a price beforehand, they'd gladly look after the kiddies. Probably cheaper than the price of a babysitter in ED!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Shall I cancel the strippers then?

>

>

> And the gambling. Put the cash towards extra

> cocaine.



On second thought, cocaine in London is over-priced rubbish. http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/london-theres-no-cocaine-in-your-cocaine-940


I think these guys had the right idea for an exciting wedding... http://wundergroundmusic.com/wedding-ruined-after-groom-accidentally-serves-guests-ketamine-instead-of-powdered-alcohol/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...