Jump to content

Wanted - nanny from sept 2015 for 3/4 days


Recommended Posts

Hi


Im returning to work in Sept and will be needing a nanny for my two girls - 3.5 years old and 7 months old. My eldest daughter will be attending pre-school in Tulse Hill/West Dulwich area so will need drop off/pick up so most of the time it will just be my youngest one at home. We live in SE22, close to goose green.

I've yet to agree exact days that I'll be going back to work with my employers but I'm assuming it will be 4 days Mon-Thurs and hours of childcare needed will be 8-6/6.30pm. There is a remote chance it could be 3 days but would think this is unlikely.

Please PM me if you're interested. We're looking for a nanny with full CRB, first aid and checkable references. Non smoker someone who can drive is preferred.

Thanks

Thank you for your post. I am a former trained nurse who previously worked both at the Royal Marsden Hospital and King's College. Have previously worked in all specialities including paediatrics. I am presently an artist who trades at Greenwich Market on occasions on Fridays. Am also a Vice Chair of a Women's Group based in Southwark and funded by Southwark and I occasionally work as a Visitor Host at Tate. I have previously done child minding. I hold a current drivers licence and own a car. I would like to express my interest in minding your children. plesitate to contact me by email as above.
  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
    • Isabelle Capitain on 7 Upland Road will be able to do that for you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...