Jump to content

Thurs/Fri Nanny-share Family Wanted for JUNE


Recommended Posts

Hello,


We currently have a nanny-share arrangement with our wonderful nanny Christina and a near-by family. However the other family are sadly moving out of London and we need to find a new family to share Christina with. Here are the main details:


- our son is nearly two years old and is now very used to a nanny share arrangement. We think the share works best with a child who is between 1-3 years old.

- the arrangement takes place on Thursday and Friday between 8.30am - 6.45pm and the cost is ?12.50 per hour (exc tax) which is shared between the families (roughly ?65 per day).

- Christina takes care of both children at our house in Nunhead (Ivydale Road) - as it is only a two day arrangement it makes most sense logistically for it to all happen in one place. We are set up for it (two cots, two high-chairs, a double buggy etc).

- Christina does lots of activities with the children both inside the house (baking, painting, messy play, garden games) and also enjoys taking them to local toddler groups. She is OFSTED registered and has excellent credentials which are available on request. Most importantly, she has been with us now for nearly 18 months and we have been impressed by her punctuality, lovely nature and dedication to the kids.


PM me if you are interested and we can chat further over the phone.


Thanks, Louise

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...