Jump to content

Thurs/Fri Nanny-share Family Wanted for JUNE


Recommended Posts

Hello,


We currently have a nanny-share arrangement with our wonderful nanny Christina and a near-by family. However the other family are sadly moving out of London and we need to find a new family to share Christina with. Here are the main details:


- our son is nearly two years old and is now very used to a nanny share arrangement. We think the share works best with a child who is between 1-3 years old.

- the arrangement takes place on Thursday and Friday between 8.30am - 6.45pm and the cost is ?12.50 per hour (exc tax) which is shared between the families (roughly ?65 per day).

- Christina takes care of both children at our house in Nunhead (Ivydale Road) - as it is only a two day arrangement it makes most sense logistically for it to all happen in one place. We are set up for it (two cots, two high-chairs, a double buggy etc).

- Christina does lots of activities with the children both inside the house (baking, painting, messy play, garden games) and also enjoys taking them to local toddler groups. She is OFSTED registered and has excellent credentials which are available on request. Most importantly, she has been with us now for nearly 18 months and we have been impressed by her punctuality, lovely nature and dedication to the kids.


PM me if you are interested and we can chat further over the phone.


Thanks, Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...