Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Sue - there is nothing nicer than sitting in a sunny beer garden with a pint or a large glass of wine - no food required or needed.


I think SteveT is thinking of quite a narrow band of peoople (ie not older or poorer people who can't AFFORD to go out to eat - not students or young people who hate to let food get in the way of a good drink up - and not people who just want a DRINK in a pub)

I don't think SteveT has it wrong at all - I think he is essentially correct on this


If the theory is that some pubs just concentrate on drink and ignore the fripperies, catering for the less well off who just want a drink, the question has to be "where are the poor people to keep these places in business?". Because they don't appear to be in the pubs which don't do food - or at least not many of them and certainly not enough of them

Well, much as I dislike pedantry, and so rarely indulge, ST and SMG are not in fact on the money with this one.


We're drinking more than ever (detailed report attached)... litres of alcohol per head per year:


1960 - 5.57

1970 - 7.00

1980 - 9.25

1990 - 9.28

2000 - 10.18

2004 - 11.20


I'm sure that Pubs could get extra money by offering a slightly more for non-drinkers, but we are drinking more and more.

But no-one is disputing (or at least I'm not) that we as a country are drinking more - it's just that that fact isn't closely connected with booze-only pubs suffering.


Most of the busy pubs serve food (and a lot more alcohol)

Most of the quiet pubs serve just booze (to fewer people)

my thoughts only on what makes a pub sucessful (hopefully)


good range of beers , wines and spirits


good range of alcohol free drinks ( hot and cold)


some food option ( different offers for different pubs)


good sports coverage ( I only run sports pubs so have no real alternative to this )


But the main thing that will get customers coming back is GOOD STAFF !


yes I shouted that bit out , you can get all the products right but useless , inept, grumpy , bored , barstaff will lose more customers than lack of food or entertaiment.


anyway , thats just my personal opinion.


cheers to the beers

all hail to the ale

and a fruit based cocktail for the ladies

(quote : Al Murray, the pub landlord, circa 2004 )


13 days to go , till the BigPhil Pub Roadshow arrives in SE15

I would say I only drink when I go to the Mag about 80% of my visits. I totally understand a preference for somewhere like the CPT but


a) to state it's really a restaurant now isn't factually accurate

b) the CPT is suffereing for a lack of customers


From a preference point of view you are right. But if the argument is (and it was) do pubs need to accomdate food to survive/thrive - I would say the answer is yes

  • 2 weeks later...
BigPhil Wrote:


But the main thing that will get customers coming back is GOOD STAFF !



This is one of the reasons The Duke failed in it's previous incarnation imo. The surly kid with the tattoos put me off going there big time.


The Gowlett and The Nun's Head seem to hang on to friendly staff who look like they really enjoy working there. The less friendly ones don't last.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A quick update - my InPost parcels are being accepted sporadically at Barry's, but only one at a time and every few days, after many refusals - one was refused SEVEN times over about ten days - and several phone calls. As a comparison, I had a message from Yodel that a parcel that was going to Barry's is being delivered to another nearby store, which is interesting...
    • The "Community Benefits" are documented on P12-16 of the Consultation Document. Basically unsubstantiated estimates that it benefits local businesses, claims that it provides "opportunities" for local food traders, businesses & people (the term "opportunities" being meaningless - I have opportunities to win the lottery) without any details, facts or figures, and discounted tickets for local residents (which unsurprisingly seldom sell out). The only direct financial benefit to the Park is a £1000 "Biodiversity Fund" and an undisclosed amount for an "Environmental Impact Fee" - looking at how it was spent this year (flower beds in the playground & Sexby garden) I suspect it would be a similarly small figure. The actual site hire fee - claimed as "commercially sensitive" and therefore undisclosed - is spent on: • Funding the council’s free events programme and Cultural Celebrations Fund • Subsidised fees for community events in the borough • Off-setting the running costs of the Events service, which supports the delivery of the free community events programme  Again, no details given, just vague concepts - can anyone name any of these free & subsidised community events? Or what the "Cultural Celebrations Fund" is or does? It doesn't really sound like any of it is worth  the disturbance, restrictions, noise, litter, environmental damage and negative impact on wildlife in our Park.  
    • The organisers must have spent a fortune on the display..imagine how p**s*d off they must have been!!!! Blink and you missed it kind of thing
    • We also recommend Aaron.  Very reliable, reasonably priced and did a fantastic job on our hallway and bedroom ceiling.  A pleasure to work with and left the house very tidy at the end of the job.  Thank you 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...