Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Procol Harum's A Whiter Shade Of Pale has now been officially recognised as the most played song in public places over the past 75 years.


The track beat Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody to the top spot, according to The People's Chart, which was compiled by music licensing company PPL to mark its 75th birthday and aired on Radio 2 yesterday.


Whats the connection between these 2 Songs Music affici..affiseen..afficiseen..followers?

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Put those teeny weeny pants away, TLS.


Who has spilt the beanz about them Moos?..


..anyway I only where them for special occassions like the anniversary of the last time Harry Hills was funny etc...:)

louisiana Wrote:


Do you work for PPL by any chance Tony?


Louisiana I'm an easy going sort who does not get easily offended but please do NOT suggest I "work" for a living My Darling....the term offends me and anyway I'm far too busy to find time for that kind of thing....eewww:)

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know. I know, you actually pass the day singing

> Kumbaya in public places...


I'm actually passing the day doing my ginagras.


If it carries on like this, I'll have to get a job..:X

Also a good contender, Huge-nut. That would have been my other choice. But for some twisted reason, I - an unbeliever - decided to give a fillip to Kumbaya, possibly the most irritating song on earth.


In general, PPL is only including as contenders 'recordings' played in public places. A 'broadcast' passive listening thing. Because that is all they are interested in on behalf of their clients.


But 'songs played in public places' suggests to me people actively playing/singing, whatever, together. Which is of absolutely no interest to PPL unless the song concerned is under copyright of a client of theirs.


And thus history is rewritten by those in power. Count the hundreds (thousands?) of references to the PPL 'anniversary story' across the interweb, already. :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...