Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blimey BN, that PGC's a pisstaker and no mistake.

They see you walking they'll have your Freedom pass back off you quicker than you can say "around the rugged rock the ragged rascal ran" five times.

Sit tight BN, hope you have a good book with you, if not look around for someone who looks as though they might have read one and engage them in conversation.


Hitting the post message button with a large Perroni and thinking of you.


XXX

Eke out each sentence then BN, I find naming the punctuation marks helps.


If that doesn't slow you down enough then start greeting each one.

"Oh, comma, been seeing a lot of you lately"

"Question Mark, how are you"?

"I say -, you're cutting a dash these days. And I see you're hanging out with comma, too. Anything me and Question Mark should know about"?


It works for me.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was stuck on a 176 :-S

>

> But too lazy to walk :))


Not lazy Sue, determined to see it through to whatever bitter end was waiting.

Bloody-minded some might call it, but it's the spirit that carried us through the Blitz.


Unlike that shirker Quids.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was stuck on a 176 :-S

> >

> > But too lazy to walk :))

>

> Not lazy Sue, determined to see it through to

> whatever bitter end was waiting.

> Bloody-minded some might call it, but it's the

> spirit that carried us through the Blitz.

>

> Unlike that shirker Quids.


xxxxxxx


:)):)):))

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, I have a horrible feeling April's about to

> kill herself (in my book) but the bus made it up

> the hill and I was home in time for Night Waves

> ...


If you have a horrble feling about it BN, then lay it to one side for now.

Read a copy of Viz instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...