Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it works.


We have worked in a few different house types and if the house is relatively thin then it works. Most people have put in a small hall/lobby to to the front door.


Open plan will affect a loft conversion as you need to have a "protected stairwell" to pass fire regs. It's still possible but requires demister system or fire curtains to pass regs. Both are somewhat expensive but worth it to maintain the open space.

I have seen some houses in Nutfield Road like that, but they are quite small. I also saw one in Upland Road, and it was open to a small kitchen at the back.


I would imagine it could be very drafty (and also very noisy) if you did not have good insulation. I think it does look attractive. Surely it's just personal taste.

Noise transfer between your place and next door would be my main concern - you'd lose that existing sound-reducing barrier between you and them. If they've done (or did) the same it's possible you'll be hearing a lot from them - and vice versa.


I quite like the way the open stairs into an open plan front room looks but I wouldn't be so keen hearing them fart as they watch telly.


If I was doing it I'd lose some inches on the party wall to add some decent soundproofing. An extra expense there again though.

in response to the OP's question, no, I wouldn't buy a Victorian house where the stairs opened into the back sitting room. it reminds me of the time when people got rid of fireplaces and panelled doors to 'modernise' their houses.

Have you thought about opening up the wall between the front and back sitting rooms as an alternative that would be more sensitive to the architectural character of your house (and maintain its future resale value)?

purplehaze Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thank you everyone - looks like majority view is -

> don't do it. The whole point of it was to

> increase resale value as the back room is a bit

> pokey.

> cs I am going to knock the wall between front and

> back living rooms



The house I grew up in (and will sell soon) had 3 rooms

where in the 70s/80s everybody else had open plan.


I remember I preferred open plan - my dad said wait

til you bring a girl home.

The two main rooms are knocked through, so we have the parliament doors from the back room to the hallway, and just a normal door from the front room to the hall. From memory, the parliament hinges were pretty easy to source, then we just got someone to build up the top part of the wall and hang the doors. I can't recommend the builders we used though. They were rubbish!

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd get a structural engineer in first if you are

> planning to do this. I have an idea that at least

> one of the walls would be load bearing.


Definitely get someone to have a look if you're considering this.

I knew someone who took the wall out. It looked lovely but when it came to selling they realised they hadn't put the proper supports in so had to put everything back to as it was.

If you already struggle with heating the rooms in the winter you'll find it even more chilly.

purplehaze Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thank you everyone - looks like majority view is - don't do it. The whole point of it was to

> increase resale value as the back room is a bit pokey.

> cs I am going to knock the wall between front and

> back living rooms



good luck - you'll prob need an rsj to support the wall above as SB and others have pointed out, but ultimately well worth the impact on your own amenity and resale value!

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...