Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sophiesofa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > i just don't know what to believe anymore.

> >

> > HB and Ted Max I wish I didn't find your jokes

> > funny but i did!

>

> The're a bunch of jokers Sophie!

>

> The only genuine thing about this thread is Dick

> Van Dyke's Cockney Accent in Mary Poppins....


Chimchiminee chimchiminee chim chim cheroo, we are those B*stards in Claret & Blue

I wouldn't worry too much about burning a bit of wood in a fireplace if you want to.


Currently offenders 'making a mockery of the law' include one in ten of the houses on your street, shops on the high street, half the pubs in the area etc etc. Plod is yet to visit them and hand out injunctions.

Is your house Victorian? The problem with wood, especially soft wood, when the fire is not burning well creosote is created in the exhaust gases which deposits on the inside of the flue. When these deposits get wet sulphuric acid is created which attacks the lime mortar that bonds the bricks together in old houses. This is why wood stoves should have a metal flue pulled down the chimney. If the fire hasn?t been used for a while get it swept and get them to put a smoke bomb up it to check for leaks especially in the loft and between floors.

I'm not really goig to convert it to a stove, it's far too small (yes Victorian), I could just about cook one marshmallow at a time on it, I think i'd either get that extra flu thing that Ted Max suggested or just use smokeless coal which is probably the most cost effective option.


Skidmarks you are a font of knowledge on the affects of different types of smoke and it's good to know that for breaking the law by using wood that justice would prevail in the form of deteriorated lime mortar. Thank you for your advice.

There is one small caveat,if burning wood is your principle source of heat then there are allowances,50% of the new Rayburns sold are now the "Wood burning" option but be aware a busy wood burning fireplace needs sweeping up to 4 times a year


Unlike gas wood did not go up 30% odd either


Also seasoned hardwood is the least smoke producing option and it has a high calorific burn value and depoists less soot in the chimney. Ash & Silver Birch are the better burners, or if you have a closed burner "sweet chestnut" is very good but spits badly. Oak smells great but is tough to burn( without coal as support)If you are a gardener the ash from the log fire can be saved and used beneficially.


There is also smokeless coal substitutes such as "coalite" these do also produce a lot of useless ash. Lastly there is Anthracite a natural & mined product suitable for burning in smokeless zones (unlike real coal which is bituminous...however coal is king for heat though .)


Lastly.......Burning wood is carbon neutral, buy british woodland logs with a 35 mile radius and support the rural economy , it is a central part of the ancient coppicing system still in use today


Well really & finally, you have to be reported by a neighbor ,then caught by the council officer actually burning or possessing non smokeless fuel...........


In Southwark they are fairly relaxed about it..........Merton however is run by the "fire gestapo"


Enjoy a good log fire....Ahh



You know you want to ....



W**F


*now light his own "log "fire.....ahhh*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...