Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The NHS is being cut each year. As demand grows (from population growth etc) the service has to meet that demand but using the same resources as the previous year.


... so you hear about NHS waste and the 'efficiencies' that could be generated by 'common sense rationalisation' ...


I'm sure there are better ways of running nhs but mistakes are going to happen along the way.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She should have had

> total priority surely as a pregnant woman of 21

> and what had happened.

>



Why?


I mean, yes she should have been attended to quite quickly, but not sure why she should have had "total priority" on the strength of being pregnant and 21. Especially when we have no idea what other calls the service had received that afternoon.

Usually I'm afraid it's because there are more category 1 calls than there are ambulances. They have to ask questions to prioritise based on risk to life eg no breathing, poor breathing, weak heart beat etc. The questions are evidenced based, but not perfect. Every call is an emergency (except of course the hundreds that aren't, but there is no easy way to identify which is which, hence the questions).

Ambulances do also have to queue at hospital to handover patients, so sometimes many are out of action. More money & more resources are needed, and less time wasters clogging up the system (obviously not this case).

TreacleRabbit Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Usually I'm afraid it's because there are more

> category 1 calls than there are ambulances. They

> have to ask questions to prioritise based on risk

> to life eg no breathing, poor breathing, weak

> heart beat etc. The questions are evidenced based,

> but not perfect. Every call is an emergency

> (except of course the hundreds that aren't, but

> there is no easy way to identify which is which,

> hence the questions).

> Ambulances do also have to queue at hospital to

> handover patients, so sometimes many are out of

> action. More money & more resources are needed,

> and less time wasters clogging up the system

> (obviously not this case).



Some photos I saw recently (not London) of queues

of ambulances waiting to drop off patients at

hospital were frightening.


Isn't that Command & Control/Administration - you'd

think there would be a way around that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...