Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't understand your question. I won't be hurt by a second nodal point but neither will I benefit as my house is likely in catchment anyway. So if you are asking if I have a bias, the answer is no. If you are asking why I care, I'm not sure what you think a legitimate reason for caring would be.


I've hurt my back and am off work for two weeks. I'm probably more engaged for this reason than I could be if I was at work.


Next week, I won't be able to respond in detail anymore, I'm sure to many people's relief :)


I'm not involved with the Charter or steering committee etc if that's what you want to know.


Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hi MickMac--

> >

> > I hoped the discussion would focus on areas

> where

> > legally the Charter has flexibility to make

> > modifications that would influence the

> composition

> > and ethos of the intake-- SEN, siblings,

> banding,

> > and lottery.

> >

>

> and are you therefore involved in the process in

> some way, or just interested in the debate?

Gubodge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lily, the same letter has been given to me at

> Goodrich (twice now) including at a meeting about

> secondary school transfers, so directly targeting

> the yr 5 parent whose children could form the

> first cohort at the new school. I was also

> buttonholed outside the school today about it, and

> did not receive a particularly friendly response

> when I said I supported the nodal point being on

> the school site. The letter has also been emailed

> to all parents by the PTA. While it is not the

> school itself that has been lobbying, the claims

> that there has been no organised campaign for an

> eastern nodal point are, to be honest, bullshit.


Trine Adams, how do you respond to this?


I think you need to re-look at the nasty accusations you have been making about DKH school and to the councillor who has obviously rattled your cage so badly.


I also enjoyed *Bob*'s comment about East Dulwich station.

LM - no, I was asking if you were involved, perhaps on the other side of the consultation, as you appear very interested in the process and its outcomes, but you are neither self interested nor not necessarily supporting the arguments from a wider ED perspective and therefore your views seem aligned with the current intentions of the school. I wondered why that was. There doesn't seem to be a reason other than perhaps you think the current approach is fairest and would like to argue for it to be maintained.

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mack - there is a shortage of non-faith,

> co-ed school places in Camberwell. Do you think

> it's fair if a child in Camberwell loses out on a

> place to an East Dulwich child who lives further

> away?

>

no - but I think its wrong that those already catered for by an outstanding school, now have another school to choose from, whilst others living in parts of Camberwell or ED have no additional choice.

This thread is getting a bit tedious now...


It's very who said what/why are you interested/i never said that.

Trine Adams - unfortunately there will be no unity on this matter. It's very heated and understandably so. Everybody wants the best for their children and for their children to get into a decent non faith co-ed school.

I reckon we should all crack on fighting as hard as we can for where we want the nodal point to be, then accept if we've won/lost with good grace and move on.

MickMack


I think a nodal point offsite is not fair under the circumstances. I actually think a lottery is fairest solution but not many like the idea and it sounds like Charter threw cold water on it at the Heber consultation! I also think the priority ranking for certain children with special needs coming after siblings should be changed.


while I think the admission policy could be better, I don't agree with what some people are pushing for. Overall, what they are proposing is reasonably fair.

Hoonaloona


what is happening on this thread is as Trine Adams asked - that people debate the nodal point to improve their understanding of what is the fairest solution and having done that, respond to the consultation.


What TA also asked for was that schools refrain from canvassing and organising opinion - this is not happening on this thread.

I'll admit to not following this thread at all, as we will be on the other side of the world for secondary education. However, the lobbying outside our school in the last few days had been aggressive and rude.


Having a piece of paper thrust in your face, when trying to get kids in the school gates with an abrupt "you have to sign this" is not pleasant. I get that it's important, but please, those who are lobbying for signatures, please understand that not everyone has read this thread and knows what the issues are. Two days in a row the same man has taken this line with me, but never even attempted to explain what he wants me to sign.

There was a posse up at the school today talking nodal points ('nodal point'.. a phrase set to become the 'new weapons of mass destruction') and how it had been moved to X but we should press for it to be more back around around Y which would give people at that school more of a chance - so I raised my fist in the air and joined in the chant: 'One, Two, Three Four - Nodal where it was before'. It was brilliant - we all hugged each other and I went home feeling totally empowered.


Unfortunately, when I got home and hit Google Maps I realised those people must all have been from the 'other' side of the school and in fact nodal point X is closer.


Naturally, these people are now my bitter enemies.

Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll admit to not following this thread at all, as

> we will be on the other side of the world for

> secondary education. However, the lobbying

> outside our school in the last few days had been

> aggressive and rude.

>

> Having a piece of paper thrust in your face, when

> trying to get kids in the school gates with an

> abrupt "you have to sign this" is not pleasant. I

> get that it's important, but please, those who are

> lobbying for signatures, please understand that

> not everyone has read this thread and knows what

> the issues are. Two days in a row the same man

> has taken this line with me, but never even

> attempted to explain what he wants me to sign.



Ooo, if it happens again, do that thing where you take it from him, tear it in to several pieces (smaller the better) and throw it up in the air before walking off.

Haha! The battle lines have been drawn.


It would be funnier if it wasn't true...



*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a posse up at the school today talking

> nodal points ('nodal point'.. a phrase set to

> become the 'new weapons of mass destruction') and

> how it had been moved to X but we should press for

> it to be more back around around Y which would

> give people at that school more of a chance - so I

> raised my fist in the air and joined in the chant:

> 'One, Two, Three Four - Nodal where it was

> before'. It was brilliant - we all hugged each

> other and I went home feeling totally empowered.

>

> Unfortunately, when I got home and hit Google Maps

> I realised those people must all have been from

> the 'other' side of the school and in fact nodal

> point X is closer.

>

> Naturally, these people are now my bitter enemies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...