Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thebeard Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ruffers Wrote:

> >


>

> Even ignoring all the blah in that, you were

> thinking she was expecting a machine to apply

> common sense?

> You're funny.



Err no I was expecting the people who run the machines (who are paid for by all of us, to serve US) to use common sense and behave with a reasonable level of decency.



We?re all funny in our own I guess you mean I?m funny peculiar and not HAHA.


Cheers

  • 2 weeks later...

Oh my goodness - thanks for all the EXCELLENT advice you super dooper forumites you....I appealed and just got a letter from Southwark stating that its technicians had confirmed the machine had been broken, and I am going to be refunded the entire ?100 clamping charge that I had to pay at the time.


Yay!!!! :)

Common sense wins following much stress anxiety forum and letter writing.





I?d still be fuming over all the time and effort they should have paid you ?100 for your troubles.



Now that would have been a balanced approach.



Maybe then the machines would have been checked before they clamped you.




ITS


Still an Upside down world here in S?^$*y money grabbing Southwark.!!!!!!!!!!!







Hope you feel really great!

Thank you, the beard.


It WAS extremely time consuming. I had to try and get through to Peckham Pulse's manager (no mean feat) and tried several times to get hold of the person. In the end, I was successful and this person was very helpful indeed. She had had a fair few complaints from punters and her staff re. cars being ticketed and clamped unfairly, and had arranged a meeting with the relevant authorities at Southwark to protest. She asked me to send her a copy of my appeal letter, which I did. IT took me ages to write the letter, as it is stated that Southwark 'doesn't take kindly' to receiving harshly worded letters. The council prefers you to be polite.


How ironic.


I think you can only know about the stress of having your car clamped if you have had it done. I actually agree with it being done if you are to blame, and have parked illegally or in a way to cause danger. But in my case Peckham Pulse had reported the broken machine to the council 5 days earlier and it had done nothing to rectify the issue, continuing to clamp and ticket people, even though it was impossible to get a ticket.


All's well that ends well though, thankfully.

I think we are living in what is effectively a police state on NOT run by the police it?s run by COUNCIL employed GANGS.



I?ve said it before it?s about justifying position / department and keeping themselves busy.





The more we stand for their nonsense the worst it will get.





I really do believe you should be awarded a payment for the time and effort and the anxiety and stress you were forced unjustly into by council staff if they got it wrong.




That is the least you should expect.



Maybe the individual council worker should be put on a warning and risk losing their job if further incompetent episodes occur.



As I said in my previous post they?d take a lot more care before issuing tickets and clamping.



Its DISGUSTING WE should not have to put up with such an IMBALANCED system.



I?ve had a number of fines where I should not have been fined in both Lambeth and Southwark.



After the personal stress of 2 appeals and meetings with parking adjudicators (both of which I won) I realised that it was far cheaper just to pay the fines the process is totally biased to the point where it is just an employment system the adjudicator makes his living from the system it?s just a farce. They could make it far more efficient and implement common sense to parking but then they?d all be out of work and then we?d have a load more on income support and unemployment benefit.





So all hail the Parking enforcement taxation and job creation system.




Soon there?ll be a Parking Uni get your BA in parking folks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...