Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can?t help thinking that we might regret this change from politicians setting their own pay.


The new regulating crew with offices secretary's salary etc will be setting the pay it will need paying for and who know if they will get it right look at the FSA and banking!


The difference between the cost of the new system and the money the MPs creamed off is marginal.


I guess its progress only it?ll probably cost us as taxpayers more as usual!

Hardly a scapegoat - the election of Michael Martin and his subsequent performance since 2000 were both disgraceful. The Labour majority voted him in out of tribalism not because, as should be the case for a Speaker, he was the best, most impartial, experienced, knowledgeable and representative member of the house who could ensure all parties and members received a fair hearing in debate.


There have been some poor Speakers in the past but Speaker Martin was down there in the 10th decile with the worst.


That said it is a symbolic gesture that is far from the only action necessary but it was a necessary preliminary to fuller and more effective action.

It would appear slightly incompetent bloke.


There will be MP?s who?ll fall on their swords too.

The cry for Blood is loud.


It?s a great distraction from the Credit Crunch.


The simple cost efficient solution would be to just give all of them a max 20k a year extra if their earnings are below say 150k.



But that would be far to simple and would not lead to a new department employing even more specialists paid for by the few british Tax payers.


As I said


I fear


THIS will only COST US MORE.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In sumary then a bloke was made a scapegoat so

> that the MP rich priviledged feckers can get the

> money they stole via their salary.



GET BACK IN YOUR COT.........



Bad CG




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was referring more to his performance at PMQs yesterday. It was quite a riot! Almost topped Mastermind  
    • Agreed, he should not be held accountable over the mess up over release of prisoners. On the other hand he did himself no favours with his gaffes on the BBC Master Mind programme where he passed on five questions. Where he did answer, here are some of his responses.... When asked who succeeded Henry VIII, Lammy incorrectly answered “Henry VII,” When asked which French scientist won Nobel prizes for both physics and chemistry?” Lammy responded with “Antoinette” When asked which fortress was built to defend Paris and later used as a prison, he answered “Versailles". When asked which variety of blue English cheese is often taken with port, he answered "Leicester" If nothing else he was entertaining.
    • Why do you think he should be toast? All these problems with the prison service apparently go way back, long before Labour took over.
    • Probably by working as a banker for a decade before being an MP, being married to another high earner, and using some of the accommodation allowance that all out-of-town MPs receive. https://www.theipsa.org.uk/news/why-do-mps-need-an-accommodation-budget Tbh mate if someone in her position couldn't work out a mortgage to buy a house in suburban London, they probably shouldn't be Chancellor in the first place...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...