Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can?t help thinking that we might regret this change from politicians setting their own pay.


The new regulating crew with offices secretary's salary etc will be setting the pay it will need paying for and who know if they will get it right look at the FSA and banking!


The difference between the cost of the new system and the money the MPs creamed off is marginal.


I guess its progress only it?ll probably cost us as taxpayers more as usual!

Hardly a scapegoat - the election of Michael Martin and his subsequent performance since 2000 were both disgraceful. The Labour majority voted him in out of tribalism not because, as should be the case for a Speaker, he was the best, most impartial, experienced, knowledgeable and representative member of the house who could ensure all parties and members received a fair hearing in debate.


There have been some poor Speakers in the past but Speaker Martin was down there in the 10th decile with the worst.


That said it is a symbolic gesture that is far from the only action necessary but it was a necessary preliminary to fuller and more effective action.

It would appear slightly incompetent bloke.


There will be MP?s who?ll fall on their swords too.

The cry for Blood is loud.


It?s a great distraction from the Credit Crunch.


The simple cost efficient solution would be to just give all of them a max 20k a year extra if their earnings are below say 150k.



But that would be far to simple and would not lead to a new department employing even more specialists paid for by the few british Tax payers.


As I said


I fear


THIS will only COST US MORE.

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In sumary then a bloke was made a scapegoat so

> that the MP rich priviledged feckers can get the

> money they stole via their salary.



GET BACK IN YOUR COT.........



Bad CG




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
    • Hello, I lost a babies blanket between Tessa Jowell and the Picture House on Lordship Lane 😞It is teal colour with the name Cillian embroidered on it.  If anyone sees/finds it please let me know.  Thank you! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...