Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it would be great if ED got a bank of Boris Bikes!


Does anyone know if TfL have considered the area before?


Perhaps with the new sponsor, Santander, it would be a good time to 'suggest' it is somewhere that would use them.


https://www.tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/santander-cycles/suggestions-and-complaints

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/63795-boris-bikes-for-ed/
Share on other sites

I think it's way to hilly around here, but what would seem viable to me would be a rack of bikes at Camberwell Green that you could use to go up Walworth Road to Elephant or along Camberwell New Road to Oval tube. Saw three kids in Walworth Road KFC late last night with their bikes in the shop.
You can't just have a bank of boris bikes with no others for miles around... would need to hit Camberwell first. Also Camberwell probably has the greater need, and as sandyman said, the local topography is more suitable. Brixton's another one which would undoubtedly get them first.
Clearly, they couldn't just come here, but they should be extended southeast, to camberwell and brixton, peckham and yes, Nunhead and Dulwich. The topography is irrelevant, there are plenty of areas with hills, which have then already. Bear in mind, they're not just for cycling into town, but for making short local trips - or connecting to train and tube stations. It would be great to be able to cycle to brixton tube for example, or into Peckham.

I agree the topography would be irrelevant if there were lots of local docking stations. I just meant it's one reason why you can't have isolated ones.


Mind you, saw a couple of young lads on boris bikes outside the chicken shop on East Dulwich Rd last week, it didn't seem to put them off.

I think it very unlikely that ED would get Boris Bikes due to Dog Kennel Hill and the potential risk or injury coming down it.


Having used Boris Bikes on occasion, the reliability of the brakes effectiveness in slowing down such a heavy bike have been poor (for me) more times than not. And the potential speed of coming down that hill is fairly great. The bikes themselves seem to have been geared in such manner to limit high top speed, not saying you can't encounter a hill whilst using a Boris Bike but looking at a map of the current docking locations they don't seem to be situated near any (looking forward to being called out on that.)


Also can't think of a suitable place for the docking station bearing in mind the space needed for the support vehicle used to ship the bikes from one dock to dock or back to their repair centre.

Saw three young women with Boris Bikes at the top of Camberwell Grove a few days back. Seems they'd had no problem with the hill.


Have also seen a couple of lads with them at the top of the big hills in Norwood - one on Knight's, one on Gipsy - but I'm not sure they came by them entirely legitimately. Something of a pattern lately.


Reckon they'd be fine down Dog Kennel - it's not all that much steeper than some of the central London bridges, just longer. I've ridden a bakfiets down Green Dale many a time.. just have to be sensible, as with any bike.


But to get from ED to Central London within the first 30 minutes of hire (& therefore not have to pay extra), you'd need to be pretty darn fit.

I heard the bikes were going to go to Brixton, then were coming to Dulwich after. A few years ago, SNUB my old green group, were at a meeting with Boris, and after we presented Mr Johnson with a SNUB bag, we asked about the bikes, and I am sure I heard Brixton being mentioned. Mr Johnson does like Dulwich, but Brixton will probably get the Santander bikes first.

Edited for typo

Dog Kennel Hill would pose no problem for a Boris Bike - the gears are so low that going up would be fine and my experience is that the brakes going downhill are also fine (I gave them a decent test one memorable morning coming down Ditchling Beacon)


That said, they clearly need to be part of a network i.e. gradual expansion is more likely. And tbh, I think Camberwell / Peckham / New Cross would be the likely limit

Whether or not they were to come to ED itself, I can see no justification for Ken Bikes not coming to SE London at all (i.e Camberwell, Peckham etc). It's a disgrace when you look at that map. No tube, trains into London Bridge blighted until 2018 and buses halted by construction of our first and only superhighway (which like the tube, stops in zone 1).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...