SHOES SIZE 41-42 women + men

By Saraginette
July 4, 2015 in For Sale & Items Offered

Recommended Posts

Saraginette

Posted July 4, 2015

- Share

Posted July 4, 2015

I am selling loads of shoes I need to get rid of asap.

Price negociable.

For more pictures please ask me.

Can sell separately or the whole batch for ?30.

- CONVERSE All Star Hi Optical White Size 8 (41)

- ZARA MAN BROWN DERBY SIZE 8.5 (42)

- VINTAGE Red boots Size 8 (41)

- H&M black faux leather platform Boots 90's grunge Size 8 (41) Platform front 3 cm, heel 11 cm.

- OFFICE Black Suede platform shoes Size 8 (41) Heel 11cm

- Truffle Collection Black front zip shoes Size 8 (41)

- Blue Wellies Size 8.5 (42)

- PRIMARK Summer salmon sandals size 7/8 (40-41)

For more photos https://www.flickr.com/gp/134439400@N03/h60Peg

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/65062-shoes-size-41-42-women-men/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Rude Evri delivery in SE22
  
  By maddison · Posted 10 minutes ago
  
  Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
- Councillor Jon Hartley
  
  By MaryT · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By jazzer · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co. He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.
- Cllr Williams to stand down
  
  By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one. In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.

Sign In