Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I generally tend to vote to ensure a strong opposition as I think that is what democracy is all about, having a voice to challenge those in power and keep them in check. Unless of course there is a specific issue which I feel one candidate can handle better than another. This is why I often vote differently for local elections than I do for general.


The idea that Labour is an opposition to Conservative and vice versa is a lie that, from my fresh naive perspective, has kept Britain in an ideological dictatorship for the better part of 30 years.


The only real ?oppositions? available in the European election were either far-left or far-right. Neither fit my personal ideology but for the reasons stated above I voted Green because the far-right option was too distasteful.

We'll they'll have to be spending cuts or raised taxes...and I think I know which one the electorate will actually go for. We, all of us, can't go on spending all this money on the Public Sector without having to pay for it properly and Flash Gordon didn't put any money away for a rainy day when the sun was out....cries of 'Tory Cuts' is just base, emotive nonsense of a pretty desperate goverment, we are going to have to cut or be taxed more. Effectively it's like we've had a cleaner, nanny, cook and gardener on about a ?35K income...not workable. We either need more income or one of them's going to have to go....and the completeley politically motivated envy taxing of ?150K+ earners won't pay for it all (if any, if many commentators are to be believed). So, more tax for you and I to be poured into an unqenchable public sector or cuts.......or we go bust. Labour doesn't appear willing to accept that this is the truth, certainly in public, and are doing their best to stop the tories doing anything about it too.
To add and show a bit of balance (maybe ;-), the Tory press will also be targeting the Public Sector pretty soon, (possibly with some justification)in terms of solid copperbacked pensions, salaries, job security, hours, holiday AND expenses . And Private Sector employees - who have born the brunt of the recession in terms of employment, seeing their private pension pots, if they have one, decimated (final salary pensions almost don't exist in the private sector) and with absolutely no chance of a guranteed job for life, in fact mainly massive job security - outnumber public sector wotrkers four to one. Imagine the Daily Mail - "Another 2p on my tax so tube drivers get a final salary pension, a ?35K+ index linked salary job for life, 8 weeks holiday and a final salary pension..." oh hang on a minute, they might have a point

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy which policies are you referring to re. the

> Greens? I switched from Labour to Green this time

> (like many others it would seem)



Citizen's Income is the main policy I disagree with. It is a non-means tested substitute for the dole, and given to everyone. It's Catch-22... if it's not enough to live on, then it's an inadequate solution. But if it is enough to live on, why bother working? They claim that people would still work because they enjoy it... I find this totally laughable.


Also, abolishing tax relief on private pension plans is a bad idea.


They support abolishment of all animal testing, including pharmaceuticals. They cling on to the crude assumption that all genetic manipulation is bad.


They have incredibly ambitious targets for emission reductions, but totally rule out nuclear energy. I don't think this has been thought through properly.


They have some progressive ideas, but so much of it seems completely naive to me.

The Citizen's Income thing sounds a bit dodgy. However being ambitious about renewable energy and banning animal testing are two things I wholeheartedly agree with.


It seems that being principled in politics is seen as naive. Personally I'd rather have people with principles in charge than the cynical, career-driven hypocrites that seem to populate the two main parties.

Jeremy, I voted for them as a mixture of protest and wanting to do something and it wasn't raining. I suspect they'll never get much true power in the UK and to a degree I don't care what they do in europe and there is a symbolic message in keeping 'green' up there somehwere. I quite like the concept of Citizen's Income...but agree with you on the others

On the whole, I'm sure it's positive that they have a presence in European parliament. As you say... keeping 'green' up there.


I like the fact that they have principles, but I disagree with a lot of their ideas. But James, if you agree with what they're trying to do, then that's great... each to their own.

Not trying to get into an argument with you Jeremy! I just think that we have lost all sense of idealism in British politics. If you're an idealist you're labelled naive and childish. Instead people are persuaded by arguments based on expediency and fear, and we end up with mediocrity.


I wish we had politicians with a little more charisma and vision. Next to Barack Obama, Cameron and Brown look like the two old men in the Muppet Show.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...