Jump to content

Recommended Posts

* caveat - this is a case in progress *


* no ranting on the specifics of this case zone *


Anyone typed the name of the person who has been charged with child abuse into facebook ?


I can see an increasing number of groups calling for the person to be hung/killed etc.


sample:


"what a dirty distgusting women................


i have 3 kids and 1 on the way............what filth.....she should have her throat cut and left to drip dry............"



Case specifics aside, whatdoes the esteemed EDF forum think about this huge site letting such groups prosper ?

I believe we already have laws against incitement to violence, and this would certainly fall foul of them


There's also social taboos - 'innocent until proven...' etc.


On the former there's a legislative issue 'cross-border'.


On the latter such liberalism is not really a concern of the great mass of humanity, hence all it takes for evil to prosper is good men to do nothing etc.

blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> * caveat - this is a case in progress *

>

> * no ranting on the specifics of this case zone *

>

> Anyone typed the name of the person who has been

> charged with child abuse into facebook ?

>

> I can see an increasing number of groups calling

> for the person to be hung/killed etc.

>

> sample:

>

> "what a dirty distgusting women................

>

> i have 3 kids and 1 on the way............what

> filth.....she should have her throat cut and left

> to drip dry............"

>

>

> Case specifics aside, whatdoes the esteemed EDF

> forum think about this huge site letting such

> groups prosper ?



Surely they should be calling for her to be hanged, not hung!


FAcebook should just pull the plug on such groups.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...