Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The metal benches were removed (not stolen!) as they were quite worn and didn't look great. There are no plans to replace these with wooden ones. The cafe has purchased more v heavy duty picnic benches that are on the grassed bit at the side of the cafe.

The idea really is to try and contain the bulk of the cafe users in the cafe and at the area to the side and not on the common to the front. This also helps with the litter.

Of course people will buy coffee/ice cream etc and go onto the common or into the park, but they are unlikely to be carting full meals around with them!

Thanks for that ,I can see the logic in that.I do occasionally just buy a coffee and bring my own lunch so I assume it will be permissable to sit at these tables then as there is nowhere esle to sit except further along which is usually shaded( I like to sit in the sun ! )

Admin, is this SE22 or did you miss lounging it?


I'm sure you didn't realise what was unfolding when you lounged the "fire at North Peckham Estate" thread, perhaps

you could move it back before EDFers start monitoring your monitoring of the general ED issues/gossip.........


A polite suggestion.

But why it was an ED issue so why suggest it should be lounged? North Peckham is a different issue but as the original poster said they were warning people who travelled that way to avoid it .Obviously once the situation unfolded .....



Sorry I am of course referring to the Fire in North Peckham thread !

?????? I'm not suggesting it remain in lounged, but t/f back to ED issues, would

it have been moved if Admin were aware of tragedy that was happening.


This is not me being arsey, as I said a polite suggestion. There are probably a lot of threads that should

be lounged, it seems to be causing unrest on the forum...them n us!

Who will the Admin side with? Forget that and do what's right, it's local enough! Let's not forget what it's really

about and on that note I'll comment no more on the matter.


Original thread"fire at North Peckham Estate"

EXCUSE ME ! but its about 45% SE22 and 55% SE15 and the benches in front of the cafe is SE15 because the cafe is SE15.....


and the Nightstalker does not differentiate so close your windows.


Oh and the run down knackered and flooding childrens 1 o'clock club is SE15.


Clunk ...penny dropping......surely not....surely the council are not that ...oh my god they are ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...