Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Been musing on this a while and seeing the BBC's vapid, gushing interview style from Glasto at the weekend reminded me.


Witness this little nugget from 1967:




Can you imagine music being discussed this objectively and intelligently today? Or am I just being hopelessly out of date and elitist? (I should add this was recorded long before I was born). The interviewer's first question, and the reaction, at 0:21 is a classic. His response might be even better. Some lovely little looks between Syd and Roger too.


As usual, the user comments are fantastically bellicose. What does everyone else think?

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Been musing on this a while and seeing the BBC's

> vapid, gushing interview style from Glasto at the

> weekend reminded me.

>

> Witness this little nugget from 1967:

>

> Pink Floyd interview

>

> Can you imagine music being discussed this

> objectively and intelligently today? Or am I just

> being hopelessly out of date and elitist? (I

> should add this was recorded long before I was

> born). The interviewer's first question, and the

> reaction, at 0:21 is a classic. His response might

> be even better. Some lovely little looks between

> Syd and Roger too.

>

> As usual, the user comments are fantastically

> bellicose. What does everyone else think?


-----------------------------------------------------------


Mattham


Back to musing for you, let us know ! say next year-ish when you've had a while to...erm......musesomemore...


(On viewing they are awfully.....well posh..!)



W**F


* god is that the time.....*

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't know Groucho Marx did interviews.

>

> Nice archive footage but I'm struggling to see any

> relevance RE 'objective and intelligent discussion

> about music'.



Have to agree, the interviewer was pissed off with them, maybe some post-LSD come down before the voices kick in...

What I was driving at was the fact the interviewer admits he doesn't like it, but goes on to discuss it at length and gives the band time to explain it all. Just seems the antithesis of the unwavering, gushing praise you get on pop tv today. I can't see Jonathan Ross conducting an interview like this. Maybe Newsnight Review or something, but never casual pop coverage.


He does seem magnificently curmudgeonly on the first viewing, but I get the impression he actually cares about the music even if he doesn't like or understand it. It's hard to hear on this clip but his last words are: "after all, why not?"


Top moustache too.

RE Glasto interviews, it was genuinely funny hearing Dizzee Rascal comparing being interviewed by Gabby Logan to chewing glass. A decidedly odd choice of interviewer anyway and her tired and patronising questions got the lack of respect they deserved. Layzeeee.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
    • The sad reality is that the failures of the Tories and Labour cannot solely be attributed to Brexit, as convenient as that may be
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...