Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Been musing on this a while and seeing the BBC's vapid, gushing interview style from Glasto at the weekend reminded me.


Witness this little nugget from 1967:




Can you imagine music being discussed this objectively and intelligently today? Or am I just being hopelessly out of date and elitist? (I should add this was recorded long before I was born). The interviewer's first question, and the reaction, at 0:21 is a classic. His response might be even better. Some lovely little looks between Syd and Roger too.


As usual, the user comments are fantastically bellicose. What does everyone else think?

mattham Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Been musing on this a while and seeing the BBC's

> vapid, gushing interview style from Glasto at the

> weekend reminded me.

>

> Witness this little nugget from 1967:

>

> Pink Floyd interview

>

> Can you imagine music being discussed this

> objectively and intelligently today? Or am I just

> being hopelessly out of date and elitist? (I

> should add this was recorded long before I was

> born). The interviewer's first question, and the

> reaction, at 0:21 is a classic. His response might

> be even better. Some lovely little looks between

> Syd and Roger too.

>

> As usual, the user comments are fantastically

> bellicose. What does everyone else think?


-----------------------------------------------------------


Mattham


Back to musing for you, let us know ! say next year-ish when you've had a while to...erm......musesomemore...


(On viewing they are awfully.....well posh..!)



W**F


* god is that the time.....*

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't know Groucho Marx did interviews.

>

> Nice archive footage but I'm struggling to see any

> relevance RE 'objective and intelligent discussion

> about music'.



Have to agree, the interviewer was pissed off with them, maybe some post-LSD come down before the voices kick in...

What I was driving at was the fact the interviewer admits he doesn't like it, but goes on to discuss it at length and gives the band time to explain it all. Just seems the antithesis of the unwavering, gushing praise you get on pop tv today. I can't see Jonathan Ross conducting an interview like this. Maybe Newsnight Review or something, but never casual pop coverage.


He does seem magnificently curmudgeonly on the first viewing, but I get the impression he actually cares about the music even if he doesn't like or understand it. It's hard to hear on this clip but his last words are: "after all, why not?"


Top moustache too.

RE Glasto interviews, it was genuinely funny hearing Dizzee Rascal comparing being interviewed by Gabby Logan to chewing glass. A decidedly odd choice of interviewer anyway and her tired and patronising questions got the lack of respect they deserved. Layzeeee.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What is your beef with me ? Why are you asking rhetorical questions?  fighting me but excusing reform? have a look in the mirror  you’ve lost your way 
    • I don't need you to tell me to 'fight against' racism.  I know what it looks it like, thank you.  And China would be our enemy whether we were in Europe or not (and has been for a long time), so that's immaterial.  I remember covering an EDL march 12 years ago, when there was a Cons-Lib Dem coalition, so the idea that this is a new problem is rubbish. BUT Reform is doing an excellent job of galvanising a minority in reaction to smug liberals like you, who blame the electorate's collective ignorance for all the country's demons.  What right have you for a moral mandate? 
    • Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.  
    • You fight against by not pretending. By calling it what it is. Instead of slyly pretending they are not racist “actually”  recognise what the country is facing and say “no” why do you even need to ask the question?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...