Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"No its not... As long as it does not say Raw, Natural Honey.. it can be labelled ay 'Honey' "


Still talking out of the wrong hole, sadly. What the rules say is:


"The purpose of this provision is to maintain the purity of honey, which is

perceived by the consumer to be an entirely natural product with nothing

added or taken away.....


...honey that contains

added ingredients may not be described as ?honey? (or by any of the reserved

descriptions)."

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone seen "Bee Movie"?

>

> Bee takes humans to court to stop them stealing

> the honey. One of my daughter's favourites, and I

> quite like it too.


I'm sure I have as the Mrs. likes animation. It was one of those if you start watching you have to continue.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

What the rules say is:

>

> "The purpose of this provision is to maintain the

> purity of honey, which is

> perceived by the consumer to be an entirely

> natural product with nothing

> added or taken away.....

>

> ...honey that contains

> added ingredients may not be described as ?honey?

> (or by any of the reserved

> descriptions)."




Whooped 'em again, Josey

I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed the 'Honey' shelf.


Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's interested) are much larger jars of what, on first glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb inside, also priced around ?2.


HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:


Ingredients as listed:


Honey (10%)

Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

Honeycomb (60%)


The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't decipher.


I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.

Craig (butcher opposite Plough) has two types of honey at ?5 for a large jar.


The darker one, he tells me, is taken from the hives when they are mainly collecting pollen from tree blossom and other woodland delights, the lighter one is more of a meadow thang.


The lighter one is cloudy-ish because some pollen is added - both are delicious.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was in Khan's today and, on my way to the chilli

> oil via the small packs of sesame seeds, passed

> the 'Honey' shelf.

>

> Alongside the Rowse honey (?2 a jar, if anyone's

> interested) are much larger jars of what, on first

> glance, looked like regular, everyday honey, with

> the added attraction of a huge slab of honeycomb

> inside, also priced around ?2.

>

> HOWEVER, ON CLOSER INSPECTION:

>

> Ingredients as listed:

>

> Honey (10%)

> Fructose Corn Syrup (30%)

> Honeycomb (60%)

>

> The jars aren't labelled 'Honey' as such, but they

> do feature a sinister-looking bee on the label and

> are of a script that my untrained eye couldn't

> decipher.

>

> I guess if you're a honey fan on the hunt for a

> cheap fix then it pays to read the ingredients.


Thank for that.

So even talking out of my arse I was still right


Foxy

The original discusion was that Blah Blah wrote.

'I get honey from khan's on Rye Lane. ?2 for a big jar and it has a piece of the actual honeycomb in it, which is a nice touch.'


And I said suggested that after buying the same product myself it was not real Honey.


When I asked in the Turkish shop on Lordship Lane for Honey I was shown the same product as

Blah Blah bought.


The jar had a Big Bee on the label and a piece of Honeycomb inside the jar that was enough

to convince Blah Blah and myself we had bought genuine Honey.


So technically being advertised and sold as Honey. Well it does have 10% honey. But 30% corn Syrup which

is what I said it was. Thats why it's ?2.00

Foxy don't bother talking about the facts. Why let them get in the way of a good opportunity for a tired old ad naseum Foxy/Louisa bashing eh?


Badgers Mount in Kent has a great garden centre that sells 100% real honey produced locally, and I can assure everyone it's a lot more than 2 quid a pop.


Louisa.

Quite right Lou..


I was just replying to Blah Blah that I was caught out by the same con.


Horsebox came up with the facts. Case Closed.


Then the usual mob step in and hijack the thread with pedantry comments with meticulous synchronicity.


You could almost set your watch by it. :)


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes let's not let the fact that ot wasn't labelled

> as honey get in the way of Fox being completely

> incapable of admitting he's wrong about anything.



Have you read ANY of this tread. ?


I said it was 'Fructose Corn Syrup ' and it was / is.



DulwichFox.. Not arguing .. Just Quoting Facts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...