Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well are they?

>

> No.

>

> The London Petanque Associaton league is currently

> topped by 2 teams, each made up of French and

> Algerians.

>

> The bastards! Coming over here and taking our

> trophies!

>

> See the Battersea Park thread for details on how

> to exact your revenge!



At least tell me they are crap at Morris Dancing, the whole fabric of rural life depends on it!!!

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Santerme Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > At least tell me they are crap at Morris

> Dancing,

> > the whole fabric of rural life depends on it!!!

>

> Is it possible to actually be good at Morris

> Dancing?



It's one of those things that can only be truly appreciated in direct proportion to alcholic intake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...