Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Details of the application with some funky looking images - see the "Enhanced 3D images" in particular. There's a new entrance to the side of the existing building on Champion Park (moreorless where bus stop is) with slope to a new overbridge providing additional steps and lifts to all platforms. The existing stairs and bridge and ticket hall look to remain as they are so much improved capacity and access all round. Can't wait!


Denmark Hill Station planning application details


If link doesn't work the application number to search for via Southwark planning register is 09 AP 0669.

Sounds good - access is dreadful for the amount of people who use it at rush hour. Particularly when they announce a platform change a minute before the train is due - with other trains arriving at the same time so the stairs are so congested that you can't get to the new platform.

BQC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I cant see Peckham rye on there?


At last, there are major plans being developed for restructuring the interior working of Peckham Rye station buildings to make it accessible. We are planning a meeting in the autumn of the Rye Lane & Station Action Group (RLSAG) to hear from the rail companies on this. The station was listed last year, so we will also be having a presentation from Benedict O?Looney, the Peckham Society expert on historic architecture, on the detailed historic aspects and how they can be accommodated in the reconstruction. We will also be hearing from the Council about the latest on the Peckham Area Action Plan process, and a number of activities and ideas which might help to transform that central part of Rye Lane. The RLSAG is an open discussion forum between residents and the various public agencies that affect our town centre. The info on its meeting will be posted here, but if you want to be on the mailing list please email me at [email protected]. You can see some background information on these matters at


Peckham Rye Station: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station

Transforming Central Rye Lane : http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Transforming_Central_Rye_Lane

An alternative vision for Rye Lane Central: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Visions_for_Peckham#An_alternative_vision_for_Rye_Lane_Central

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looks like Rachael is getting close to the toaster again! The media is out to  get her after they got duped.
    • I think “high rises” and “crime” might be your words not mine  “liking the character of an area” is something I imagine mos people feel.  But it is subjective.  What year was your home built? Should it not have been? To preserve the character of the area at that time?    I don’t think building is the only solution.  Investment landlords and multiple property owners could also be tackled but simply saying “no. Because character of area” isn’t going to help anyone growing up in the area get a place to live 
    • I had a frustrating (non) delivery experience with Yodel recently who I believe are now part of InPost. Fortunately the supplying company had some kind of customer service so got a refund Totally agree with last paragraph, one of the excuses I was given for non delivery was bizarre. Delivery companies and suppliers offer delivery on a certain day and when they're unable to fulfil this they lay a false tracking trail. Think Amazon may also do this.
    • I called InPost when I saw the first parcel had been refused twice, they said it was because the shop didn't have capacity / space. I went to the shop and they basically said that was BS, that they had plenty of space and showed me the parcels from that day's InPost delivery - they even went through all the parcels to see if mine was there. I called them again a couple of days later after the tracking showed the first parcel had been refused twice more, and two others had also been refused. They said they'd investigate and would send me an email (nope) and to contact Vinted. I called them again today after further refusals, again they said they'd investigate and for me to contact Vinted - they seemed to intimate that they could only do something if Vinted contacted them, despite me trying to explain that it is impossible to contact anyone at Vinted, let alone get them to chase up parcels. Tbh I don't believe the tracking updates are based on actual events, it stinks of lost parcels that they just don't want to admit to, so just keep pretending they're trying to deliver them and update the tracking info. I can't think of any other reason this would happen. Although very odd if it is this, as all the parcels were sent from different places and at different times.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...