Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Slocky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hope they take the opportunity to do something

> other than another identikit tandoori. Like the

> one next door. And the one opposite.


There are 8 'Curry Houses' on Lordship Lane / Grove Vale.

They are hardly 'identikit' tandooris. They are very different as curry lovers like the regulars

of the Curry Club would tell you. They all have their own favourite curry places that others are

not so keen on.


This will be the 4th ? rebirth of an Asian food outlet after previously being a Fish & Chip shop.

Eastern Eye, Cinnamon Club, Veer Zara being previous Asian restaurants.


No doubt Curry Club (including myself) will be among the first to try out this new place when it opens..


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-901795
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes the restaurants may well be a bit different

> and people have their preferences, but they are

> essentially offering the same menu straight out of

> 1985.


The Menu today in Indian restaurants is far more extensive than it was in 1985..


Fish & Chip shops are offering the same menu straight out of 1860...


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-901877
Share on other sites

Strange that Veer Zara and the one next door to it are almost always empty then.


Yes, they are pretty much all out of 1985 and Ive not been in one ED "curry house" that I didn't find disappointing. Fortunately, Ganapati is just down the road and I live in hope that VZ might relaunch along those lines.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-901938
Share on other sites

Slocky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Strange that Veer Zara and the one next door to it

> are almost always empty then.

>

> Yes, they are pretty much all out of 1985 and Ive

> not been in one ED "curry house" that I didn't

> find disappointing. Fortunately, Ganapati is just

> down the road and I live in hope that VZ might

> relaunch along those lines.


The Curry Club has been going for 8 years and we go to a different L.L. Indian restaurant every month.

We have been to all of the Curry restaurants many many times.

Usually 6 - 12 of us. We are seldom disappointed.


We have been to Ganapati once maybe twice.. ?

There were 8 ish of us and certainly several of us were disappointed.

I'm a small eater but with a starter, popadoms main, rice, bread, and a dessert I wasn't full.


What ever the restaurant is called, supposedly it is to have a B.B.Q pit and serve cocktails.

So Indian food with a Turkish twist.. ?? Sound good to me.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-901962
Share on other sites

I have no problem with the kind of generic anglicised Indian food these restaurant along LL serve. In fact I often like it a lot. Just don't think we need so many, doing very similar food.


Ganapati - I remember going to the restaurant five or six years ago and feeling it was really mediocre. Tough meat, lacking flavour, and not worth the money. But since the takeaway opened we've been using it regularly and we've always loved it (and we're definitely not small eaters!). The menu does vary, maybe they don't always get it right?


Dishoom is fun, but I'd be happy with proper, simple home-cooked-style regional Indian or Bangladeshi food. If it was done well it would leave the other LL curry houses for dust.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-901970
Share on other sites

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ray,Ray,Ray. You really can't get the hang of this

> can you?

>

>

> ay80 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > my regular curry house is jaflong and also they

> > recently made the restaurant BYOB which is

> great

> > because they don't charge for corkage



I thought it was a point worth making - I assumed they probably did charge for corkage.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-902248
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes the restaurants may well be a bit different

> > and people have their preferences, but they are

> > essentially offering the same menu straight out

> of

> > 1985.

>

> The Menu today in Indian restaurants is far more

> extensive than it was in 1985..

>

> Fish & Chip shops are offering the same menu

> straight out of 1860...

>

> Foxy


Not quite. Minus Victorian adulterated flour ...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/73370-veer-zara/#findComment-903594
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...