Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In my opinion this is not your neighbours' falt, but the builders. If the Sky engineer spoke with them, I'd be asking them for the money, not the neighbours who didn't put the scaffolding up.


I appreciate that this is very annoying for you, but to them it's probably pretty far down the list of things to worry about at this time.

BlueOrchid Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry that previous response was to the first

> comment.

>

> To respond to the second comment - they are both

> lawyers. I don't think I can threaten them with

> court.

>

> Also - I want to be on good terms with my

> neighbours - and more than the money it saddens me

> that this is an indication that we are not going

> to be living next door to people who are

> considerate.

Of course you can! If you can prove their scaffolding caused your Sky to fail then they will just pay up!


You need it in writing from the sky engineer that this was the cause. Once you have that I think they will be unlikely to argue.


If you PM me their names I will check out what kind of lawyers they are - other than in inconsiderate ones!

Tallulahdoesthehula Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BlueOrchid Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sorry that previous response was to the first

> > comment.

> >

> > To respond to the second comment - they are

> both

> > lawyers. I don't think I can threaten them with

> > court.

> >

> > Also - I want to be on good terms with my

> > neighbours - and more than the money it saddens

> me

> > that this is an indication that we are not

> going

> > to be living next door to people who are

> > considerate.

> Of course you can! If you can prove their

> scaffolding caused your Sky to fail then they will

> just pay up!

>


But it's not enforceable?


> You need it in writing from the sky engineer that

> this was the cause. Once you have that I think

> they will be unlikely to argue.

>


Based on the fact that they have already repeatedly ignored requests?

BlueOrchid Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They still live in central London so I doubt they

> are using the forum yet.


:-)


Good luck with that! Most incomers start using local forums before they move to an area precisely to find out more about It (and then promptly stop using it when they move in)!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...