Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It does seem strange that the management have to hire a consultant to tell them how to cut costs. I am surprised the management are not capable of deciding for themselves.


However, it's a bit naive to say "why don't they pay someone else 40k to do the job". Assuming that they genuinely need an experienced senior accountant/consultant - for 40k a year they'd be lucky to get a newly qualified accountant.

I agree with you Jeremy, I guess they wanted the negotiating crutch of an 'independent expert'.


If that is the case, it speaks volumes about the militant workforce that they've crippled the management into spending this amount of money every time they want to change something.


I wonder whether NHS employees are aware that their constant attacks on management have had such a destructive effect... that it is the attitudes of the employees that have possibly brought the institution into such a parlous state?


Militant workforces often don't realise that running an effective organisation is a two way street.

I'm not sure that I agree with your assertion that a platform cleaner could do better at running a rail system than a trained professional, but each to his own etc. ;-)


My original comment was a hypothetical... 'If that was the case, etc...'


If it was the case that 'any' workforce had undermined the managers ability to manage, then that would indeed qualify as a militant disruptive workforce.


I only stuck the NHS into that list as a ribald joke.


However, my experiences with public health systems elsewhere in the world do suggest that a better job could have been done to date. I think it's convenient and populist to 'blame the management', but the management aren't another race of evil knirds trying to stuff it up - they're undoubtedly trying to do the best they can within the confines of the system.


If the workforce is part of the problem then they need to take responsibility for their negative contribution.

I'm not sure that I agree with your assertion that a platform cleaner could do better at running a rail system than a trained professional


Trained in what? Management speak bollox that shows no real understanding of the specific idiosyncracies of the industry in question, glossed over with that wonderful job title "consultant", or training in actually managing that industry?



A few years back, when an A&E department that I was working in was struggling with the monthly targets, the managers were all over us all day every day about what could be done to speed up waiting times. One of the managers even noticed that a lot of the problems were at night, and dutifully signed up for a night shift, volunteering to push wheel chairs and photocopy paperwork and generally do menial but time consuming things to speep up waiting times. After one night shift, one(and not even a particularly busy one) the man looked like Charlie Sheen at the end of Platoon, and he apparently gave a fairly spirit rebuttal in the next target meeting about how the management tier had absolutely no idea what the medical and nursing staff were doing on a daily basis and the pressure that they were under. Target not achieved that month. Manager took full responsibility without blinking. A short lived coup, and his memory proved even shorter as he was back on our backs the very next month, but it meant the world at the time.



Healthcare managers are not (usually) clinicians, and for all that they have a plethora of skills in human resources and various other management guff, they do not understand the very basic concepts of the product that they are managing. Equally, I'm not suggesting that clinicians would necessarily make better managers - far from it, their micro-managment of specific areas without an overview would doubtless bugger up the whole system - but there needs to be a mutual understanding and a cooperative relationship between the 2. As a result of this, nursing and medicine have started to introduce management skills as one progresses up the career structure. But healthcare managers are not required to have any understanding of how healthcare should be delivered, and yet have the power to undermine clinical practice with local regulations put in place with managerial, fiscal or possibly even political motivation.



The bottom line is that the NHS is, essentially, a business from the top down and a service from the bottom up: there's always going to be some uneasy territory in the middle where those ideologies meet. But chucking a management ultra-gimp, with a made up job title and skills that are only really relevant at the extreme business end, into the already uneasy middle ground is not the solution.


Unfortunately, like all grass roots complainers, I have no idea what is.

We've had someone walking around our lab for the last few months, clipboard in hand, whose job it is to find ways of making us more efficient. I've only caught some of her comments as i've meandered* through while she was discussing ideas, but everything i've heard just sounds like ( what i call ) w*nkspeak. I said that it's easy to make us more efficient, just tell everyone to work faster.


*on review, i don't think meander was the correct word as it implies a slow, graceful & serene movement, whereas i'm alot more powerful & charged like a rocket..or something

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...