Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need some help to decide how to proceed with a building project.


An architect has designed a nice side return and loft conversion ? nothing spectacular but not a standard box frame/velux.


The choice seems to be: use a building company that has lots of experience ? the companies often recommended on the site ? who will own the project and sideline the architect. A possible drawback that the structural plan becomes a guide and we morph towards something standardised or can be completed in the shortest time the builder can get away with ...


OR? we use the architect to manage the whole process and follow the drawings to the letter. We don?t want grand designs ? it is not a forever home ? and we know the risks of cost appreciation and delays of design led projects.


Any tips or experiences to share please?


Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/74091-architect-led-building-projects/
Share on other sites

A neighbour did the latter, paid the architect in full for it (stupid) and has now found that the builders have left the site, with work remaining unfinished (mainly finishing-off stuff, but new rooms not really usable till it's done). With no direct relationship (or leverage) on the builder things aren't too happy.


Generally you need to stay on the plot, so if you use a builder you make sure that they are following the plans - (with the proviso that however good the plans appear to be, it is often a good builder who will note that something in the plan isn't actually feasible). But builders do follow plans (excluding those implementing local road schemes, apparently) - so they won't try to impose their ideas, unless the architect gets it wrong (or unless the plans don't match local building regs). Having someone local and experienced can be helpful, they will know the council building inspectors and what they look out for. That's also true regarding the type of house you have - if it's 'typical' for the area a local builder will (very probably) know the necessary tricks for installing internal stairways to best effect.


Depending on the work you (or the builder) may well have to involve a structural engineer as well as an architect - particularly where a loft is concerned regarding loadings etc.)

I had a terrible experience with an architect drawing up plans and the builder not only changing them but not even following good practice. Had to have the extension knocked down and rebuilt. The second time I use an architect and the builder she recommended. Worked much better - I got what I wanted and expected within budget and was confident it was not going to fall down around my ears.


If I was to do it again, I would probably go with an architect, BUT you need one that is good at managing builders and not just interested in designing. Get references from completed projects and ask them how the building process went (rather than how pleased they were with the architect).

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

The architect I have used is Mike Jack (0208 771 4996/[email protected]). His work as an architect has been first class and I could not recommend him more. I have decided to use him as project manager and Lucas Construction to be the builders. We have had very good references for both so I will post in a few months with the outcome of the project. Fingers crossed.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

We are an architect practice based in South London and have carried out a number of house extensions and refurbishments, some of which can be seen on our website: www.nimtim.co.uk. We would be happy to provide testimonials from previous clients and you can visit some of the completed projects. We would also be able to help with local contractors that we recommend, as well as other consultants eg. party wall surveyor, structural engineer etc. if required.

Good luck with your project - we find it to be a very exciting time,


Nimi Attanayake ARB RIBA

nimtim architects


e - [email protected]

m - 07539039455

t - 02077338761

w - www.nimtim.co.uk

Fair point. Find a builder that's done some stuff you like then - and you're happy with 'the taste' of what they've done, whatever it is - and tell them you'd like one like that.


I suppose my point is, you're either paying an architect to continually check-up on a builder to make sure they're not doing anything that looks shit, or you get a builder that you're confident isn't going to do anything that looks shit. If I had to choose, I'd go with the latter.


Getting both is great, but it's going to cost you..

It's good to get some initial ideas from someone else and it's good to get the plans drawn-up.


But personally, I'd draw the line there, let a good builder take over - and sort the rest out with them myself along the way. If they're good they know exactly what they're doing and you can communicate with them directly.


Depends on how involved you want to be, of course.

I agree with that. If you have a very strong idea of what you want already, just get someone who can draw up the plans. That's what we did and to be honest, I found our architect quite useless despite lots of recommendations on the forum.


They suggested we put showers where there was no headroom etc. In the end, I sketched out most of the design myself for them and they used that as basis for the documents. We paid an hourly rate for bi-weekly site visits to sign off work before making payments to the builder the architect recommended. Beyond that we managed the build ourselves including agreeing design changes that came up due to issues that came up during the build.


How much you need an architect depends on how much time you have to spend on the build, if you have a good sense of space and design and if you have strong project management skills.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...