Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need some help to decide how to proceed with a building project.


An architect has designed a nice side return and loft conversion ? nothing spectacular but not a standard box frame/velux.


The choice seems to be: use a building company that has lots of experience ? the companies often recommended on the site ? who will own the project and sideline the architect. A possible drawback that the structural plan becomes a guide and we morph towards something standardised or can be completed in the shortest time the builder can get away with ...


OR? we use the architect to manage the whole process and follow the drawings to the letter. We don?t want grand designs ? it is not a forever home ? and we know the risks of cost appreciation and delays of design led projects.


Any tips or experiences to share please?


Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/74091-architect-led-building-projects/
Share on other sites

A neighbour did the latter, paid the architect in full for it (stupid) and has now found that the builders have left the site, with work remaining unfinished (mainly finishing-off stuff, but new rooms not really usable till it's done). With no direct relationship (or leverage) on the builder things aren't too happy.


Generally you need to stay on the plot, so if you use a builder you make sure that they are following the plans - (with the proviso that however good the plans appear to be, it is often a good builder who will note that something in the plan isn't actually feasible). But builders do follow plans (excluding those implementing local road schemes, apparently) - so they won't try to impose their ideas, unless the architect gets it wrong (or unless the plans don't match local building regs). Having someone local and experienced can be helpful, they will know the council building inspectors and what they look out for. That's also true regarding the type of house you have - if it's 'typical' for the area a local builder will (very probably) know the necessary tricks for installing internal stairways to best effect.


Depending on the work you (or the builder) may well have to involve a structural engineer as well as an architect - particularly where a loft is concerned regarding loadings etc.)

I had a terrible experience with an architect drawing up plans and the builder not only changing them but not even following good practice. Had to have the extension knocked down and rebuilt. The second time I use an architect and the builder she recommended. Worked much better - I got what I wanted and expected within budget and was confident it was not going to fall down around my ears.


If I was to do it again, I would probably go with an architect, BUT you need one that is good at managing builders and not just interested in designing. Get references from completed projects and ask them how the building process went (rather than how pleased they were with the architect).

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

The architect I have used is Mike Jack (0208 771 4996/[email protected]). His work as an architect has been first class and I could not recommend him more. I have decided to use him as project manager and Lucas Construction to be the builders. We have had very good references for both so I will post in a few months with the outcome of the project. Fingers crossed.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

We are an architect practice based in South London and have carried out a number of house extensions and refurbishments, some of which can be seen on our website: www.nimtim.co.uk. We would be happy to provide testimonials from previous clients and you can visit some of the completed projects. We would also be able to help with local contractors that we recommend, as well as other consultants eg. party wall surveyor, structural engineer etc. if required.

Good luck with your project - we find it to be a very exciting time,


Nimi Attanayake ARB RIBA

nimtim architects


e - [email protected]

m - 07539039455

t - 02077338761

w - www.nimtim.co.uk

Fair point. Find a builder that's done some stuff you like then - and you're happy with 'the taste' of what they've done, whatever it is - and tell them you'd like one like that.


I suppose my point is, you're either paying an architect to continually check-up on a builder to make sure they're not doing anything that looks shit, or you get a builder that you're confident isn't going to do anything that looks shit. If I had to choose, I'd go with the latter.


Getting both is great, but it's going to cost you..

It's good to get some initial ideas from someone else and it's good to get the plans drawn-up.


But personally, I'd draw the line there, let a good builder take over - and sort the rest out with them myself along the way. If they're good they know exactly what they're doing and you can communicate with them directly.


Depends on how involved you want to be, of course.

I agree with that. If you have a very strong idea of what you want already, just get someone who can draw up the plans. That's what we did and to be honest, I found our architect quite useless despite lots of recommendations on the forum.


They suggested we put showers where there was no headroom etc. In the end, I sketched out most of the design myself for them and they used that as basis for the documents. We paid an hourly rate for bi-weekly site visits to sign off work before making payments to the builder the architect recommended. Beyond that we managed the build ourselves including agreeing design changes that came up due to issues that came up during the build.


How much you need an architect depends on how much time you have to spend on the build, if you have a good sense of space and design and if you have strong project management skills.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...