Jump to content

Recommended Posts

if you are going to take a stand, it seems the Daily Mail thinks you have to be whiter than white.


Should we expect different legal treatment of comments made on linked-in as compared to comments made on facebook?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html

The whole thing's a bit of a car crash.


The legal profession is very old fashioned and good on her for trying to shake it up a bit.


I didn't think much of the whole thing until I read what the male barrister posted under his own daughter's photo. That's just a little bit creepy.


She is quite hot though.

Neither have come out looking particularly good, have they?


He had an outside chance of saving his name with a dodgy excuse right up until the daughter thing came out. I'm trying to decide if she has spectacularly over-reacted and severely injured her career or is a fantastic publicity seeker who has taken an opportunity to expand her career in new directions. Time will tell on that one, but even the Guardian couldn't really summon up the will to back her, which says a lot.


Best one-liner went to the wag who dubbed her 'Gal Qaeda'.

Of all the things that go on every day on social media... harassment, bullying, racism, inciting hatred and violence, religious extremism, suicide pacts, child abusers... and THIS is front page news... crazy.


He was in the wrong of course, but it's been blown out of all proportion.

Very double standard considering she called a man on the same website hot stuff. But was offended by another that called her stunning, I wonder if the bloke she called hot stuff made the same complement as the older gentleman would she be offended or is this an age thing.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very double standard considering she called a man

> on the same website hot stuff. But was offended by

> another that called her stunning, I wonder if the

> bloke she called hot stuff made the same

> complement as the older gentleman would she be

> offended or is this an age thing.


Not quite.. the "hot stuff" comment was on Facebook. The difference supposedly being that FB is social an LI is professional.. but it seems like a shaky argument to me. The whole thing is daft.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Not quite.. the "hot stuff" comment was on

> Facebook. The difference supposedly being that FB

> is social an LI is professional.. but it seems

> like a shaky argument to me. The whole thing is

> daft.



And hence the OP was worded as such a question.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MM - I was addressing Ridgley's comment more than

> I was addressing your OP.

>


yes I know - I was pointing out that ironically, it took a lot of posts before anyone actually mentioned the issue I was interested in. And I think she has a point, to some extent LinkedIn is not a forum for comments like that - its not really social media, its business media and any message also I believe goes to the persons email address, hence its a very stupid thing to do in that context.


I'd suggest that on Facebook you might get away with a bit of flirty banter, to some extent that's part of the package - although her comments have come back to bite her.


The age difference makes it a bit of an inappropriate comment in any event.

Newsworthy enough for her to be interviewed on Newsnight.


She refers in the interview to LinkedIn as a professional space. If you refer to the OP, this was the prompt and I agree with her on that.


I disagree with her about many things bit LinkedIn is not social media and the guy is a plonker.

I think she's used this as a bit of a PR stunt, but she's completely right in principle. As for the tendency of women to be judged on their looks in the legal profession, I could tell you stories that would make the most hardened "It's PC GONE MAAAADDD!" type start swearing off calling people feminazis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...