Jump to content

Recommended Posts

if you are going to take a stand, it seems the Daily Mail thinks you have to be whiter than white.


Should we expect different legal treatment of comments made on linked-in as compared to comments made on facebook?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3229951/Ooh-la-la-hot-stuff-s-prim-barrister-centre-sexism-storm-said-men-ogled-web.html

The whole thing's a bit of a car crash.


The legal profession is very old fashioned and good on her for trying to shake it up a bit.


I didn't think much of the whole thing until I read what the male barrister posted under his own daughter's photo. That's just a little bit creepy.


She is quite hot though.

Neither have come out looking particularly good, have they?


He had an outside chance of saving his name with a dodgy excuse right up until the daughter thing came out. I'm trying to decide if she has spectacularly over-reacted and severely injured her career or is a fantastic publicity seeker who has taken an opportunity to expand her career in new directions. Time will tell on that one, but even the Guardian couldn't really summon up the will to back her, which says a lot.


Best one-liner went to the wag who dubbed her 'Gal Qaeda'.

Of all the things that go on every day on social media... harassment, bullying, racism, inciting hatred and violence, religious extremism, suicide pacts, child abusers... and THIS is front page news... crazy.


He was in the wrong of course, but it's been blown out of all proportion.

Very double standard considering she called a man on the same website hot stuff. But was offended by another that called her stunning, I wonder if the bloke she called hot stuff made the same complement as the older gentleman would she be offended or is this an age thing.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very double standard considering she called a man

> on the same website hot stuff. But was offended by

> another that called her stunning, I wonder if the

> bloke she called hot stuff made the same

> complement as the older gentleman would she be

> offended or is this an age thing.


Not quite.. the "hot stuff" comment was on Facebook. The difference supposedly being that FB is social an LI is professional.. but it seems like a shaky argument to me. The whole thing is daft.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Not quite.. the "hot stuff" comment was on

> Facebook. The difference supposedly being that FB

> is social an LI is professional.. but it seems

> like a shaky argument to me. The whole thing is

> daft.



And hence the OP was worded as such a question.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MM - I was addressing Ridgley's comment more than

> I was addressing your OP.

>


yes I know - I was pointing out that ironically, it took a lot of posts before anyone actually mentioned the issue I was interested in. And I think she has a point, to some extent LinkedIn is not a forum for comments like that - its not really social media, its business media and any message also I believe goes to the persons email address, hence its a very stupid thing to do in that context.


I'd suggest that on Facebook you might get away with a bit of flirty banter, to some extent that's part of the package - although her comments have come back to bite her.


The age difference makes it a bit of an inappropriate comment in any event.

Newsworthy enough for her to be interviewed on Newsnight.


She refers in the interview to LinkedIn as a professional space. If you refer to the OP, this was the prompt and I agree with her on that.


I disagree with her about many things bit LinkedIn is not social media and the guy is a plonker.

I think she's used this as a bit of a PR stunt, but she's completely right in principle. As for the tendency of women to be judged on their looks in the legal profession, I could tell you stories that would make the most hardened "It's PC GONE MAAAADDD!" type start swearing off calling people feminazis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would leave London, or at a push move back to north London. In SE London if you want to get away in a car you are trapped, always an hour to go the first 10 miles, chugging up to the M4 or round the south circular, which is really just a line someone drew connecting a load of roads. and I know there are trains but first you have to get to those mainline stations, unless you only want to leave London to go to Kent. which I don't. 
    • It was you who  made it personal in the first place,  Jazzer. You said you didn't feel safe in the streets,  and you said you didn't go to Central London because you didn't feel safe there. So are you now saying that wasn't "personal"? "Fire from the hip." Another interesting choice of words 🙄 I'm not "demanding" anything! I asked you some perfectly reasonable questions in  response to your own statements. None of which you have answered. Never mind. It seems to be pointless having a discussion with you. It's long past my bedtime. I'm going to turn on my sleep app  and go to sleep 😴💤
    • Hi Forumites, This afternoon someone in a dark blue/black saloon car collided with my parked car on Thompson Road, SE22 9JR. I have a neighbour’s doorbell cam footage of the collision at 14:30 19/09/2025 but am unable to identify the registration plate. If anyone has footage of a car travelling down Thompson Road towards Crystal Palace Road at that time please PM me. Of course if the Perp would like to confess they can also PM me. Thankyou.
    • Fireworks again tonight, Melbourne Grove North LTN area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...