Jump to content

Good brunch places for visiting kids?


DM1

Recommended Posts

Hiya... I have my brother, nephews and niece (1 to 5yrs) coming to visit soon and wondered if anyone could suggest anywhere particularly kid friendly with good food to go for brunch? Have tried all obvious places before: Hormiman, Dulwich Park Cafe, Crystal Palace Park cafe etc etc. Just trying to think if there's any good new ones for kids?!


Thanks very much for any suggestions!

I've always loved and respected Fox on the Hill. This is on champion hill/ Denmark hill! They have kids menu, a large garden and inside family area, away from others who don't want to sit around children. Good prices. Over 20 years I have gone there.

Yes - Toasted is pretty kid friendly (in the daytime) and their breakfast/brunch is the best around. Very closely followed by Pedler. Although I would say that Pedler is a bit cramped and not really set up with pushchairs and stuff in mind.


Trio on Bellenden Rd is specifically aimed at young kids and there's a play area with toys and books. Very spacious, loads of room for pushchairs. But the menu is quite limited - e.g. bacon sandwiches, pastries (albeit very good ones), egg & soldiers. Really good coffee and fresh juices.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Its crazy, they raise membership prices due to the refurb but things are worse than before.
    • That example seems fair enough - but wouldn’t say it’s completely analogous to the Trump situation the STORY (your caps) is about the bbc edit precisely because of what happened that day and people’s ability to brush it under the carpet. I think the edit didn’t  need to be done in that way to make the exact same point. So it’s wrong thing to do, but it isn’t actually incorrect in its point - and people should be reexamining the events and not the edit  and I don’t think it’s political to say or do this. If your supporter example played out that way then fair enough - I just cannot agree that in this case the edit fundamentally changes what he said, meant or did  - especially without events transpired   It could definitely be made more explicit but given what actually happened… ? At least hopefully at this point we are being less aggy with each other and trying to make our points 
    • But THE STORY is about a BBC edit, and its impartiality issues, not about the storming of the capital. And it's not the first time deceitful editing has been a story - there was the whole Queen scandal too.  I love the BBC and hate seeing the corporation frankly unable to remain impartial anymore. It breaks my heart, because we do have a higher standard in this country and that's what keeps us on the right side of history - not people like Trump.  A long time ago I made a film about a Trump supporter. I came into the edit one day and the editor and edited him to say something quite bigoted, which he simply never said. Luckily I spotted it. The editor's excuse was 'well it's the kind of thing he would say'. I made him take it out, because it was dishonest and you have to leave your politics at the door if you want to be a good documentarian. 
    • Showers are still cold today.  When I asked at Reception, I was told that one of the boilers was now repaired and they were just waiting for the water to warm up!  The pool was pretty cold today as well,  Still a load of grit /dirt on the bottom, seems to be getting worse.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...