100s

[Laddy Muck]

100

[karter]

cheat!

[katie1997]

REF!!!!!!!!!!

You bunch of cheats with all that Jameson's nonsense. Just wait till ???? is next online... :))

[Laddy Muck]

PS: Camberwell70, I know you are definitely not the little Leppy...now hand over that half-consumed bottle of whiskey please...LOL

[karter]

LM and narnia belong together. CHEATS!

hi katie, hope you are all well.x

[Laddy Muck]

WOTTA LOAD OF SOUR GRAPES LOL LOL LOL!!!

All very valid and, given the thread, a masterstroke by moi...better than that sly puss' (aka Jeremy) recent 10,000, in my opinion.

In your face:

- Lady-Katherina-van-de-poop-poops

- karter-sour-face

- Mr. green-with-envy Medic

- Sly-puss-ha-ha-Jeremy

- Master-will-be-fuming-Quids

and last, but not least

- the elusive-is-going-to-be-more-then-a-trifle-miffed-tee-hee-Leppy-Narnia

BYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Alan Medic]

Whatever happened to Lady Muck? I think going from a d to a double d has gone to her head..........or elsewhere!

[Annette Curtain]

Lazy Muck more like

Still he's alright really

Nette:)

[karter]

Whatever happened to woof Mark the doggie? She was alright also.

[katie1997]

He (Laddy Muck) sounds like he hasn't yet come to terms with Jeremy's 10,000 win. So is resorting to foul play for the 100 on the 100...tsk tsk.

van der poop poop indeed! (6)

[Laddy Muck]

Ahhh such jokers...

*adopts sombre expression and recites*

- thou shalt not be bitter

- thou shalt not covet that 10,000

- thou shalt not mock those who lack proficiency in the 100s game

- thou shalt honour the Creator of the 100s game: Master Quids (though everyone else can go and...)

- thou shalt turn the other cheek to the sour-grapeness of others

[Alan Medic]

It has been written that a 100 (or is than an 'an'?) in the 100's thread is the equivalent to and own goal and comes with an automatic 6 month suspension.

[Jeremy]

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> better than that sly puss' (aka Jeremy) recent 10,000, in my opinion.

What was sly about my glorious 10000?

[Laddy Muck]

Jeremy Wrote:

----------------------------------------------

> What was sly about my glorious 10000?

Sly Puss...wicked, tricksey, I ought to wring his filthy little neck. Filthy little thief...he stole it from under my nose...curse him...we wants the Precious and to be Queen of 100s Game once more... thief, filthy little thief. Where is it? Where is it? He stole it from me...my Precious. Curse him, we hates him! It's mine and we wants it. I wasn't expecting it (LOL)... I had been stalking it for weeks! It was mine I tell you, mine. The PRECIOUSSSSSSS WAS MINE.....Sly Puss ruins everything...

As for you, Mr. Medic, sub-section ix of Clause 6.3.1(a)(iii) states that "any purported rule alleged by any dubious member of less than 3 months shall be ruled inadmissible evidence". You, have only been around 2 months and a bit: nuff said! Furthermore, your assertion is merely circumstancial - not to mention - hearsay. Case dismissed.

[Alan Medic]

Who are YOU calling 'dubious'?

[Alan Medic]

BTW I got an 8500er this morning while you were persumably snoring your head off!

[Laddy Muck]

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who are YOU calling 'dubious'?

Try this for size...

...if it fits then you are dubious (it's close enough!)...

tee hee

[Laddy Muck]

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW I got an 8500er this morning while you were

> persumably snoring your head off!

Referred for Adjudication:

Post 1:

Re: Football Focus

Posted by: Alan Medic Today, 06:29AM

What do women know about football eh?

Post 2:

Re: Football Focus

Posted by: Alan Medic Today, 06:30AM

Oh.........8500

Sub-section II of Clause 9.3.1(b)(iv) provides that where a valid score is preceded by an offensive or potentially offensive post, then that score shall be invalidated.

The current arbiter of the 100s Game, having reviewed the evidence before him determines that Alan Medic's score should not stand as it is in breach of the above. Moreover, given the imflammatory nature of the preceding post, there is to be no right of appeal.

Decision: 8500 disallowed.

[maxxi]

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sub-section II of Clause 9.3.1(b)(iv) provides

> that where a valid score is preceded by an

> offensive or potentially offensive post, then that

> score shall be invalidated.

>

Otherwise known as the Keys-Gray clause.

[Laddy Muck]

Thank you maxxi. It is highly refreshing to observe someone displaying a perfect understanding of this rule.

[Alan Medic]

You make them up as you go along. It's not even your game. Anyway, any idiot could play 100's. How about trying my NEW GAME...........73's. Let see if you're any good at that.

Edited to correct mistakes

[Laddy Muck]

*repeats for the second time today*

- thou shalt not mock those who lack the necessary proficiency and skill for the 100s game

- thou shalt turn the other cheek to the sour-grapeness of others

(Holy Mary, Mother of God - give me strength...I mean, 73's...LOL)

[Alan Medic]

* should be moved to recycling bin *

[DonkyOne]

Oh

[????]

When I'm not around it just goes to pot.

Alan Medic first of all does a 100 not in the lounge and then crows about his 4500......which he set up himself with post 4499 -er, disallowed. Learn the rules Alan, you're worse than Declan.

Laddy M - you are suspended as ref couldn't even spot a basic infringement like that...back to school.

Karter you fancy reffing in my abscence?