Jump to content

Labour councillor Chris Gonde's steps down in South Camberwell ward anyone know why?


Recommended Posts

Just received my poll card in South camberwell ward, as Labour councillor Chris Gonde has stepped down. Does anyone know why???


We go to the polls on 15th October 2015.


The candidates are as follows (in alphabetical order):


Benjamin Maitland, Lib Dems


Christopher Mottau, Conservatives


Eleanor Margolies, Greens


Octavia Lamb, Labour


Stephen Govier, All People's Party.



The polling station has also been changed to Amott road baptist church in Armott road se15

This is what he is quoted as saying to Southwark News http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/by-election-called-after-labour-councillor-steps-down/ :


"

A second Labour councillor has stepped down in less than six months, citing a poor work-life balance in his resignation statement.


Chris Gonde, who was elected eighteen months ago to the South Camberwell ward, admitted that he found it ?increasingly difficult? to balance his many business responsibilities with his family life.

"


I wish him and his family well.

Bit surprising he couldn't wait until next March when the by-election could have taken place alongside the GLA elections avoiding the council spend ?20,000 to run this by election on standalone basis.

If he can't serve his constituents as fully as he feels he should (for whatever reason) then it's only proper that he should stand down.


Putting money before democracy might seem ok on Tooley Street but for the sake of ?20,000 it's better that his ward has a new councillor now rather than hanging on for six months with no representation at all. And the cost of the standalone by-election is only ?10k more than will be squandered on the Melbourne Grove segregation barrier study.

Hi Abe_Foreman,

The ward does have two other councillors. We also have rules to support councillors being unavailable for up to 6 months or longer. So to suggest South Camberwell wouldn't have representation is to suggest the other two councillors aren't available - which they are. it is a shame to spend ?20,000 when money is quite so tight. But if he felt he really couldn't wait and was told the cost to our community in hard cash then he is obviously has to leave.

And I'm sure he found this decision really hard. Good luck to him.

Chris is a good man. He lives in my road and we worked in the same laboratory at King's. I like him. Although our politics don't coincide, I was pleased that he was my councillor. I met him by chance at the Sainsbury's superstore the morning after I learnt that he was stepping down -- we chatted. He hopes to continue to be active in politics, he told me, but he can't at the same time do justice to both councillor duties and his two girls, who are under ten. (Maybe his failing to respond to Mustard's e-mails is part of being too thinly stretched.)


I suppose there's no knowing how much of your life being a councillor will devour till you are sworn in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...