Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree that good design needn?t cost more to build. A good firm may cost marginally more than a less gifted design firm but that is a marginal cost and as has been illustrated, the requirement to alter and change the original design can offset any potential savings on the initial A&E costs.

rch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard about the CGS cancellation from the chair

> of the Dulwich Society, who met with two

> councillors... it could be confusion about the

> double bid, but the basic reason given for the

> cancellation was that it was thought that the

> police wouldn't use the annexe and that it was a

> poor use of funds considering budget cuts. So even

> if the funding is still intact, it doesn't sound

> like the premises will be available for a

> community safety contact point, which means that

> we'll have to find somewhere else anyway.

>

> In any case, the communication from the council

> has been so bad that it's questionable whether

> this will work out or not, even if the funding was

> still available. Everyone is so fed up that we're

> beginning to feel that we simply need to do

> everything ourselves now...

>

> Can you try to find out what's going on and let us

> know?


How come the Dulwich Society are in the know, and the rest of the community has to find out what is happening from them? Who do they represent? Certainly not me - their ties to local vested interests makes them far from impartial arbiters of what is best for the area.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I wouldn't say it's a typical modern school

> building




Based on the schools I visit (in Newham), ity looks very typical of the ones that have been built / extended in recent years. Doesn't look great, but at the end of the day, if the kids get a good education, so what?


Whether they will get a good education is a different thread.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll miss the horses too.

>

> I wouldn't say it's a typical modern school

> building - a lot of schools are really

> thoughtfully designed, this is not. Even on a

> budget, it is possible to take account of

> aesthetic considerations, and the look (and

> therefore feel) of a school does matter IMO. I

> know it's all a matter of taste, but even using

> plain white render would be better (and cheaper).



The horses moved out over a decade ago

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll miss the horses too.

> >

> > I wouldn't say it's a typical modern school

> > building - a lot of schools are really

> > thoughtfully designed, this is not. Even on a

> > budget, it is possible to take account of

> > aesthetic considerations, and the look (and

> > therefore feel) of a school does matter IMO. I

> > know it's all a matter of taste, but even using

> > plain white render would be better (and

> cheaper).

>

>

> The horses moved out over a decade ago



So what? Doesn't mean people can't remember them fondly.

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...